Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures

Two groups of Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) were trained to locate a hidden goal which was consistently located at one corner of a fully enclosed rectangular environment with distinctive cues available at each corner. One group was trained in a small enclosure, whereas the second group was trained in a large enclosure. Once the birds were showing accurate search behavior, they were presented with non-reinforced tests in either the same sized environment as training or the novel sized environment, as well as in a square-shaped environment. The birds were able to accurately search at the two geometrically correct corners when the four distinctive features were removed showing that they had encoded geometry. Although accuracy was greater when tested in the same sized environment as during training, accuracy was above chance in both environments. Regardless of the size of training enclosure both groups showed primary control by features along with secondary control by geometry. Furthermore, when the features and geometric cues provided conflicting information as to the goal location, both groups weighed featural cues over geometry, and this was independent of whether the size of the testing environment was maintained or manipulated. These results show that for Clark's nutcrackers the size of the environment had little effect on the weighing of featural and geometric cues. Furthermore, although nutcrackers encoded both features and geometry, when spatial cues provided discrepant information as to the goal location, nutcrackers relied primarily on features. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: CO3 2013.

[1]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[2]  Joseph H. R. Maes,et al.  Spatial reorientation in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Use of geometric and featural information as a function of arena size and feature location , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  P. Bednekoff,et al.  Long-term spatial memory in four seed-caching corvid species , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  Coadaptations of the Clark's nutcracker and the pinon pine for efficient seed harvest and dispersal. , 1977 .

[5]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The effect of proximity on landmark use in Clark's nutcrackers , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  Differential memory for different cache sites by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) , 1990 .

[7]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000 .

[9]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[10]  A C Kamil,et al.  Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[12]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The seed-storing corvid Clark's nutcracker learns geometric relationships among landmarks , 1997, Nature.

[13]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Features enhance the encoding of geometry , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[14]  K. Gould,et al.  What scatter-hoarding animals have taught us about small-scale navigation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  A. Kamil,et al.  Linking Life Zones, Life History Traits, Ecology, and Spatial Cognition in Four Allopatric Southwestern Seed Caching Corvids , 2006 .

[16]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[17]  Performance of Four Seed-Caching Corvid Species in the Radial-Arm Maze Analog , 1994 .

[18]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[19]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Growing in Circles , 2007 .

[20]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[21]  A. Kamil,et al.  Long-term spatial memory in clark's nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Comparing black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli): use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[23]  A. Kamil,et al.  A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Alan C Kamil,et al.  Tests for cognitive mapping in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2001, Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[26]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[27]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[28]  A. Kamil,et al.  A synthetic approach to the study of animal intelligence. , 1987, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[29]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Russell P. Balda,et al.  Cache recovery and spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 1985 .

[31]  B. Gibson,et al.  The synthetic approach to the study of spatial memory: Have we properly addressed Tinbergen's “four questions”? , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[32]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[33]  Debbie M Kelly,et al.  Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[34]  A C Kamil,et al.  Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory. , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[35]  Aleida J Goodyear,et al.  Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) and the effects of goal--landmark distance on overshadowing. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[36]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Landmark use by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana): influence of disorientation and cue rotation on distance and direction estimates , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[37]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[39]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[40]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[41]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[42]  ALAN C. KAMIL,et al.  The use of local and global cues by Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Alexandra D. Twyman,et al.  Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation. , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.

[44]  K. Gould,et al.  Memory in Food Caching Animals , 2008 .