Complementary Medicine and Oncologists’ Attitudes: A Survey in Italy

Aims and Background There is growing interest in medical practices other than conventional medicine (complementary medicine, CM). CM is widely used by cancer patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge of and the attitude towards CM in a sample of Italian allopathic oncologists. Methods Seventy-six oncologists of the Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro of Genoa, 80 oncologists working at the Istituto Tumori Fondazione Pascale of Naples, and 100 hospital practitioners of the Province of Sondrio were asked to answer a self-administered structured questionnaire on CM. The level of their knowledge on CM, their opinion on CM and on CM therapists, the sources of information, the use of CM for themselves, the practice of CM and the attitude to refer patients to CM were investigated. Results Replies were received from 190 oncologists. The response rate was significantly lower for the oncologists of Naples. One-fifth of the physicians replied that they had no knowledge of CM. The main sources of information were newspapers and TV. One-fourth of the physicians had personally used CM. About one-fourth of the physicians had practiced a kind of CM. The percentage of oncologists from Genoa who would refer their cancer patients to CM was significantly higher than the others. The physicians thought that about 84% of their patients used CM. The variables considered were tested in a multivariate model. The oncologists from Genoa showed a significantly increased risk of referring their patients to CM. Oncologists who had personally used CM referred patients to CM 3 times more frequently than the others. Conclusions A large percentage of cancer patients used CM according to their physicians. The level and the quality of the knowledge of CM of the oncologists interviewed were low. The oncologists could hardly be helpful for their patients in dealing with therapies different from conventional medicine.

[1]  J. Neher,et al.  Referrals for alternative therapies. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[2]  J. Neher,et al.  A clinical approach to alternative medicine. , 1994, Archives of family medicine.

[3]  T. Young,et al.  Complementary therapies used by patients with cancer , 1994, BMJ.

[4]  Peter Fisher,et al.  Medicine in Europe: Complementary medicine in Europe , 1994 .

[5]  T. Lister,et al.  Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment , 1994, BMJ.

[6]  G. Burrows,et al.  The use of alternative therapies by children with cancer , 1994, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  E. Kahan,et al.  Attitudes of family physicians to nonconventional therapies. A challenge to science as the basis of therapeutics. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[8]  H. Northcott,et al.  Concurrent utilization of chiropractic, prescription medicines, nonprescription medicines and alternative health care. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[9]  M. Kochen,et al.  Complementary medicine: are patients' expectations being met by their general practitioners? , 1993, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  W. Anderson,et al.  Patient use and assessment of conventional and alternative therapies for HIV infection and AIDS. , 1993, AIDS.

[11]  B. Kennedy,et al.  The prevalence of questionable methods of cancer treatment in the United States , 1992, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  S. Hauser,et al.  Unproven methods in oncology. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[13]  D. Guerry,et al.  Survival and quality of life among patients receiving unproven as compared with conventional cancer therapy. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  F. Mortensen,et al.  [Alternative treatment forms used by patients with muscular atrophy. A questionnaire study of the use of alternative treatment by 345 patients with muscular atrophy]. , 1990, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[15]  M. Boisset,et al.  Alternative medicine use by rheumatology patients in a universal health care setting. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.