Computational design of soluble analogues of integral membrane protein structures
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Ovchinnikov | B. Correia | S. Georgeon | S. Rosset | D. Baker | M. Pacesa | J. Dauparas | Christian Schellhaas | Casper A. Goverde | Lars J. Dornfeld | Simon Kozlov | Nicolas Goldbach
[1] G. Gao,et al. De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints , 2023, Nature.
[2] S. Ovchinnikov,et al. Efficient and scalable de novo protein design using a relaxed sequence space , 2023, bioRxiv.
[3] Valentin De Bortoli,et al. SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation , 2023, ICML.
[4] Mohammed AlQuraishi,et al. Generating Novel, Designable, and Diverse Protein Structures by Equivariantly Diffusing Oriented Residue Clouds , 2023, ICML.
[5] Alexander Rives,et al. Language models generalize beyond natural proteins , 2022, bioRxiv.
[6] Hamed Khakzad,et al. De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network , 2022, bioRxiv.
[7] Brian L. Trippe,et al. Broadly applicable and accurate protein design by integrating structure prediction networks and diffusion generative models , 2022, bioRxiv.
[8] D. Hilvert,et al. Design and optimization of enzymatic activity in a de novo β‐barrel scaffold , 2022, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[9] Raphael R. Eguchi,et al. De Novo Design of a Highly Stable Ovoid TIM Barrel: Unlocking Pocket Shape towards Functional Design , 2022, Biodesign research.
[10] Rianne van den Berg,et al. Protein structure generation via folding diffusion , 2022, Nature communications.
[11] L. Carter,et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies , 2022, Science.
[12] S. Ovchinnikov,et al. Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning , 2022, Science.
[13] Brian L. Trippe,et al. Diffusion probabilistic modeling of protein backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem , 2022, ICLR.
[14] B. Sankaran,et al. Robust deep learning based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN , 2022, bioRxiv.
[15] Tudor Achim,et al. Protein Structure and Sequence Generation with Equivariant Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models , 2022, ArXiv.
[16] S. Liao,et al. A backbone-centred energy function of neural networks for protein design , 2022, Nature.
[17] D. Baker,et al. De novo design of immunoglobulin-like domains , 2021, bioRxiv.
[18] J. Korbel,et al. AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold , 2021, bioRxiv.
[19] David T. Jones,et al. Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design , 2021, bioRxiv.
[20] Oriol Vinyals,et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.
[21] A. Myasnikov,et al. Structural basis of human ghrelin receptor signaling by ghrelin and the synthetic agonist ibutamoren , 2021, Nature Communications.
[22] D. Woolfson. A brief history of de novo protein design: minimal, rational, and computational. , 2021, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] Gyu Rie Lee,et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track neural network , 2021, Science.
[24] David E. Kim,et al. Protein sequence design by conformational landscape optimization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[25] Birte Höcker,et al. Evolution, folding, and design of TIM barrels and related proteins , 2021, Current opinion in structural biology.
[26] Radka Svobodová Vareková,et al. CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..
[27] D. Baker,et al. De novo design of transmembrane β-barrels , 2020, bioRxiv.
[28] Conrad C. Huang,et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[29] S. Iwata,et al. Structure of an antagonist-bound ghrelin receptor reveals possible ghrelin recognition mode , 2020, Nature Communications.
[30] David Baker,et al. De novo protein design by deep network hallucination , 2020, Nature.
[31] Brian D. Weitzner,et al. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks , 2020, Nature Methods.
[32] Po-Ssu Huang,et al. Protein sequence design with a learned potential , 2020, bioRxiv.
[33] J. Gough,et al. The SCOP database in 2020: expanded classification of representative family and superfamily domains of known protein structures , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..
[34] Christopher J. Williams,et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix , 2019, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.
[35] F. Fraternali,et al. Lipid Head Group Parameterization for GROMOS 54A8: A Consistent Approach with Protein Force Field Description , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[36] J. Kaduk. Structure validation , 2019, International Tables for Crystallography.
[37] Regina Barzilay,et al. Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design , 2019, DGS@ICLR.
[38] M. Zacharias,et al. A single residue switch reveals principles of antibody domain integrity , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[39] D. Baker,et al. De novo design of a non-local β-sheet protein with high stability and accuracy , 2018, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.
[40] A. Tichá,et al. The Rhomboid Superfamily: Structural Mechanisms and Chemical Biology Opportunities. , 2018, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[41] William Sheffler,et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel , 2018, Nature.
[42] M. Congreve,et al. Structure-Based Optimization Strategies for G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Allosteric Modulators: A Case Study from Analyses of New Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu5) X-ray Structures. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[43] David E. Gloriam,et al. Pharmacogenomics of GPCR Drug Targets , 2018, Cell.
[44] Christopher J. Williams,et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validation , 2018, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[45] David E. Gloriam,et al. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[46] David Baker,et al. Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl , 2017, eLife.
[47] Hiroshi Suzuki,et al. Crystal structures of claudins: insights into their intermolecular interactions , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[48] J. Cochran,et al. Emerging Strategies for Developing Next-Generation Protein Therapeutics for Cancer Treatment. , 2016, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[49] D. Baker,et al. De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy , 2015, Nature chemical biology.
[50] D. Nagarajan,et al. Design of symmetric TIM barrel proteins from first principles , 2015, BMC Biochemistry.
[51] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[52] A. Plückthun,et al. Engineered proteins with desired specificity: DARPins, other alternative scaffolds and bispecific IgGs. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.
[53] O. Nureki,et al. Crystal Structure of a Claudin Provides Insight into the Architecture of Tight Junctions , 2014, Science.
[54] David Baker,et al. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity , 2013, Nature.
[55] Jeffery G. Saven,et al. A Computationally Designed Water-Soluble Variant of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor: The Human Mu Opioid Receptor , 2013, PloS one.
[56] Arwin J. Brouwer,et al. Activity-based probes for rhomboid proteases discovered in a mass spectrometry-based assay , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[57] R. Stevens,et al. Structure-function of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. , 2013, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.
[58] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. Testing of the GROMOS Force-Field Parameter Set 54A8: Structural Properties of Electrolyte Solutions, Lipid Bilayers, and Proteins , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[59] A. Dunker,et al. Proline Rich Motifs as Drug Targets in Immune Mediated Disorders , 2012, International journal of peptides.
[60] A. Sharff,et al. Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[61] P. Emsley,et al. Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[62] R. Dror,et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.
[63] Bartek Wilczynski,et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics , 2009, Bioinform..
[64] Colin A. Smith,et al. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[65] Eric A. Althoff,et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.
[66] Valérie Capra,et al. The Highly Conserved DRY Motif of Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Beyond the Ground State , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.
[67] M. Parrinello,et al. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[68] V. Hornak,et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.
[69] Yongcheng Wang,et al. Crystal structure of a rhomboid family intramembrane protease , 2006, Nature.
[70] R. Sterner,et al. Catalytic Versatility, Stability, and Evolution of the (βα)8‐Barrel Enzyme‐Fold , 2006 .
[71] Holger Gohlke,et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[72] J. Skolnick,et al. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[73] Jeffery G. Saven,et al. Computational design of water-soluble analogues of the potassium channel KcsA , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[74] Dennis R. Burton,et al. Human antibody–Fc receptor interactions illuminated by crystal structures , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.
[75] T. Steitz,et al. Rational design of 'water-soluble' bacteriorhodopsin variants. , 2002, Protein engineering.
[76] M. Freeman,et al. Drosophila Rhomboid-1 Defines a Family of Putative Intramembrane Serine Proteases , 2001, Cell.
[77] Berk Hess,et al. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .
[78] T. Steitz,et al. Conversion of phospholamban into a soluble pentameric helical bundle. , 2001, Biochemistry.
[79] J. Gerlt,et al. New wine from old barrels , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.
[80] A. Poupon,et al. The immunoglobulin fold family: sequence analysis and 3D structure comparisons. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[81] K. Konvička,et al. A proposed structure for transmembrane segment 7 of G protein-coupled receptors incorporating an asn-Pro/Asp-Pro motif. , 1998, Biophysical journal.
[82] Berk Hess,et al. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..
[83] Alain Carpy,et al. MLPP: A Program for the Calculation of Molecular Lipophilicity Potential in Proteins , 1997 .
[84] T. Darden,et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .
[85] R. Abagyan,et al. Second-generation octarellins: two new de novo (beta/alpha)8 polypeptides designed for investigating the influence of beta-residue packing on the alpha/beta-barrel structure stability. , 1995, Protein engineering.
[86] P Bork,et al. The immunoglobulin fold. Structural classification, sequence patterns and common core. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[87] M. Hecht,et al. De novo design of beta-sheet proteins. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[88] Hoover,et al. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.
[89] S. Nosé. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods , 1984 .
[90] M. Parrinello,et al. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .
[91] Martin Steinegger,et al. Foldseek: fast and accurate protein structure search , 2022 .
[92] Jian Li. Targeting claudins in cancer: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. , 2021, American journal of cancer research.
[93] Justin A. Lemkul. From Proteins to Perturbed Hamiltonians: A Suite of Tutorials for the GROMACS-2018 Molecular Simulation Package [Article v1.0] , 2019, Living Journal of Computational Molecular Science.
[94] A. F. Williams,et al. The immunoglobulin superfamily--domains for cell surface recognition. , 1988, Annual review of immunology.
[95] G. Richards. Intermolecular forces , 1978, Nature.