Formative Feedback: Involving Students as Partners in Assessment to Enhance Learning

Planning time for giving students effective feedback is an important and challenging aspect of the teaching and learning process. In our article we describe and analyze how we engage students as partners in providing formative feedback in time for students to modify their own thinking or behavior to improve learning. We have found ways to provide formative feedback more frequently and to involve students in providing effective formative feedback to each other. The four techniques we describe are the following: a) three-color group quiz with feedback on product, process, and progress; b) midterm student conferencing; c) shared revision of student generated questions and statements; and d) timely feedback using collaborative assignment blogs. These techniques give feedback in time for revisions to occur, provide scaffolding for learners, inform instruction, and most importantly, involve students as partners in assessment. These pedagogical strategies show that the resulting benefits of improved instruction, enhanced student learning, and better student products are worth the time and effort and contribute to a productive classroom climate where the focus is on learning more than on grading. Formative feedback involving students as partners is a key strategy to enhance the teaching and learning process.

[1]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[2]  Nancy M. Trautmann.  Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports , 2009 .

[3]  Richard J. Stiggins,et al.  Student-Involved Classroom Assessment , 2000 .

[4]  P. Black,et al.  Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom , 2004 .

[5]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[6]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Classroom Assessment: Minute by Minute, Day by Day In classrooms that use assessment to support learning, teachers continually adapt instruction to meet student needs. , 2005 .

[7]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Helping Standards Make the GRADE , 2001 .

[8]  P. Tunstall,et al.  Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: a typology , 1996 .

[9]  Andrea Motto.  Peer learning: a strategy for practical explainer training , 2008 .

[10]  R. Butler.  Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. , 1987 .

[11]  Richard J. Stiggins,et al.  Student-Involved Assessment FOR Learning , 2004 .

[12]  David Fontana,et al.  Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. , 1994 .

[13]  Gary A. Smith.  How Does Student Performance on Formative Assessments Relate to Learning Assessed by Exams , 2007 .

[14]  Walter P. Vispoel,et al.  Success and Failure in Junior High School: A Critical Incident Approach to Understanding Students’ Attributional Beliefs , 1995 .

[15]  V. Shute.  Focus on Formative Feedback , 2007 .