Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.

This work investigated the performance in terms of collection efficiency and aspiration efficiency of a personal sampler capable of collecting ultrafine particles (nanoparticles) in the occupational environment. This sampler consists of a cyclone for respirable particle classification, micro-orifice impactor stages with an acceleration nozzle to achieve nanoparticle classification and a backup filter to collect nanoparticles. Collection efficiencies of the cyclone and impactor stages were determined using monodisperse polystyrene latex and silver particles, respectively. Calibration of the cyclone and impactor stages showed 50% cut-off diameters of 3.95 μm and 94.7 nm meeting the design requirements. Aspiration efficiencies of the sampler were tested in a wind tunnel with wind speeds of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 m s(-1). The test samplers were mounted on a full size mannequin with three orientations toward the wind direction (0°, 90°, and 180°). Monodisperse oleic acid aerosols tagged with sodium fluorescein in the size range of 2 to 10 μm were used in the test. For particles smaller than 2 μm, the fluorescent polystyrene latex particles were generated by using nebulizers. For comparison of the aspiration efficiency, a NIOSH two-stage personal bioaerosol sampler was also tested. Results showed that the orientation-averaged aspiration efficiency for both samplers was close to the inhalable fraction curve. However, the direction of wind strongly affected the aspiration efficiency. The results also showed that the aspiration efficiency was not affected by the ratio of free-stream velocity to the velocity through the sampler orifice. Our evaluation showed that the current design of the personal sampler met the designed criteria for collecting nanoparticles ≤100 nm in occupational environments.

[1]  H. Fissan,et al.  Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area , 2006 .

[2]  David L. Swift,et al.  Nasal Deposition of Ultrafine Particles in Human Volunteers and Its Relationship to Airway Geometry , 1996 .

[3]  D. Swift,et al.  Deposition of Ultrafine Aerosols and Thoron Progeny in Replicas of Nasal Airways of Young Children , 1995 .

[4]  Matthias Voetz,et al.  Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles , 2010 .

[5]  P. Hoet,et al.  Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks , 2004, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[6]  H Kromhout,et al.  A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. , 1997, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  K. Willeke,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF THE SAMPLING EFFICIENCY OF PERSONAL INHALABLE AEROSOL SAMPLERS USING A SIMPLIFIED PROTOCOL , 2000 .

[8]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1989 .

[9]  Bean T. Chen,et al.  Design and Use of a Settling Chamber for Sampler Evaluation Under Calm-Air Conditions , 2003 .

[10]  Chun-Nan Liu,et al.  Novel active personal nanoparticle sampler for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  J H Vincent,et al.  A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. , 1986, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  S C Soderholm,et al.  Proposed international conventions for particle size-selective sampling. , 1989, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  Yung-sung Cheng,et al.  Deposition of Ultrafine Particles in Human Tracheobronchial Airways of Adults and Children , 2001 .

[15]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  James H Vincent,et al.  New experimental methods for the development and evaluation of aerosol samplers. , 2002, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[17]  W. Hinds,et al.  Comparison of a Simplified and Full-Size Mannequin for the Evaluation of Inhalable Sampler Performance , 2001 .

[18]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[19]  Wolfgang G Kreyling,et al.  Dosimetry and toxicology of ultrafine particles. , 2004, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[20]  Andrew D. Maynard,et al.  The sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in low air movement environments , 1999 .

[21]  B. Asgharian,et al.  Deposition of ultrafine particles in the upper airways: An empirical analysis , 1990 .

[22]  Andrew R. McFarland,et al.  An Aerosol Wind Tunnel for Evaluation of Massive-Flow Air Samplers and Calibration of Snow White Sampler , 2004 .

[23]  S N Li,et al.  Evaluation of six inhalable aerosol samplers. , 2000, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[24]  P. Lioy,et al.  Rationale and Recommendations for Particle Size-Selective Sampling in the Workplace , 1986 .

[25]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  Characterization of airborne particles during production of carbonaceous nanomaterials. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Yung-sung Cheng,et al.  Evaluation of IOM Personal Sampler at Different Flow Rates , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[27]  Bahman Asgharian,et al.  Deposition of Ultrafine (NANO) Particles in the Human Lung , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.

[28]  William G Lindsley,et al.  A two-stage cyclone using microcentrifuge tubes for personal bioaerosol sampling. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[29]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Nanoparticles and the Environment , 2005 .

[30]  R. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1990 .

[31]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.