Modeling the stance leg in two-dimensional analyses of sprinting: inclusion of the MTP joint affects joint kinetics.

Two-dimensional analyses of sprint kinetics are commonly undertaken but often ignore the metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joint and model the foot as a single segment. Due to the linked-segment nature of inverse dynamics analyses, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ignoring the MTP joint on the calculated joint kinetics at the other stance leg joints during sprinting. High-speed video and force platform data were collected from four to five trials for each of three international athletes. Resultant joint moments, powers, and net work at the stance leg joints during the first stance phase after block clearance were calculated using three different foot models. By ignoring the MTP joint, peak extensor moments at the ankle, knee, and hip were on average 35% higher (p < .05 for each athlete), 40% lower (p < .05), and 9% higher (p > .05), respectively, than those calculated with the MTP joint included. Peak ankle and knee joint powers and net work at all joints were also significantly (p < .05) different. By ignoring a genuine MTP joint plantar flexor moment, artificially high peak ankle joint moments are calculated, and these also affect the calculated joint kinetics at the knee.

[1]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  ON OPTIMAL FILTERING FOR INVERSE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS , 1996 .

[2]  B. Nigg,et al.  Mechanical energy contribution of the metatarsophalangeal joint to running and sprinting. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Marshall,et al.  Segment-interaction analysis of the stance limb in sprint running. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  H. Elftman THE WORK DONE BY MUSCLES IN RUNNING , 1940 .

[5]  D. Stefanyshyn,et al.  The relationship between extension of the metatarsophalangeal joint and sprint time for 100 m Olympic athletes , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  J. Buckley,et al.  Muscle power patterns in the mid-acceleration phase of sprinting , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Herbert Elftman,et al.  FORCES AND ENERGY CHANGES IN THE LEG DURING WALKING , 1939 .

[8]  P. Komi,et al.  Knee and ankle joint stiffness in sprint running. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  G. Trewartha,et al.  Choice of sprint start performance measure affects the performance-based ranking within a group of sprinters: which is the most appropriate measure? , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  M. Yeadon The simulation of aerial movement--II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R V Mann,et al.  A kinetic analysis of sprinting. , 1981, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  At L Hof,et al.  Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  D. Kerwin,et al.  Lower-limb mechanics during the support phase of maximum-velocity sprint running. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  G. J. van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Intermuscular coordination in a sprint push-off. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Peter Goldsmith,et al.  A comparison of forefoot stiffness in running and running shoe bending stiffness. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  N. Hopkinson,et al.  A comparison of barefoot and sprint spike conditions in sprinting , 2009 .

[17]  Doris I. Miller,et al.  The biomechanics of sport : a research approach , 1973 .

[18]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[19]  Heikki Kyröläinen,et al.  Effects of muscle – tendon length on joint moment and power during sprint starts , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.