Toward Multi-brain Communication: Collaborative Spelling with a P300 BCI

In a brain-computer interface (BCI), users perform specific mental tasks to convey messages or commands through direct measures of brain activity. Typically, users must perform each mental task for two or more seconds before their brain activity is distinct enough for accurate classification. In P300 BCIs, this usually entails silently counting specific flashes three or more times. Although numerous articles have explored the prospect of a P300 BCI that relies on only one flash, results consistently show that the resulting accuracy would be too low for effective communication. The goal of this article was to introduce a new way to reduce the time to identify a message or command. Instead of relying on brain activity from one subject, our system utilized brain activity from eight subjects performing a single trial. Hence, the system could rely on an average based on eight trials, which is more than sufficient for adequate classification, even though each subject contributed only one trial. Results confirmed that all eight subjects could not have attained effective control with a single trial, but could attain 100% accuracy when the other seven subjects’ data were also used. This is the first time that people worked together to accomplish a goal with a BCI, and could encourage future research into collaborative brain-based communication and control.

[1]  J.D. Bayliss,et al.  Use of the evoked potential P3 component for control in a virtual apartment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  G R Müller-Putz,et al.  Toward smarter BCIs: extending BCIs through hybridization and intelligent control , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Helge J. Ritter,et al.  Improving Transfer Rates in Brain Computer Interfacing: A Case Study , 2002, NIPS.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[5]  G.F. Inbar,et al.  An improved P300-based brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Comparison of Dry and Gel Based Electrodes for P300 Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[8]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  Rapid Communication with a “P300” Matrix Speller Using Electrocorticographic Signals (ECoG) , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Is It Significant? Guidelines for Reporting BCI Performance , 2012 .

[11]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Brain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts , 2012, Soft Computing.

[12]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Co-adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  A. Kübler,et al.  Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  John R. Smith,et al.  Steady-State VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Control in an Immersive 3D Gaming Environment , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[16]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends , 2012, Front. Neuroeng..

[18]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Affective Brain-Computer Interfaces (aBCI 2011) , 2011, ACII.

[19]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  A combined brain–computer interface based on P300 potentials and motion-onset visual evoked potentials , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  E W Sellers,et al.  Suppressing flashes of items surrounding targets during calibration of a P300-based brain–computer interface improves performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.