Hitting moving targets with a continuously changing temporal window

Abstract Hitting a moving target requires that we do not miss the target when it is around the aimed position. The time available for us not to miss the target when it is at the position of interest is usually called the time window and depends on target’s speed and size. These variables, among others, have been manipulated in previous studies but kept constant within the same trial or session. Here, we present results of a hitting task in which targets underwent simple harmonic motion, which is defined by a sinusoidal function. Target velocity changes continuously in this motion and so does the time window which is shorter in the centre (peak velocity) and longer at the turning points (lowest velocity) within a single trial. We studied two different conditions in which the target moved with a reliable (across trials) amplitude displacement or reliable peak velocity, respectively, and subjects were free to decide where and when to hit it. Results show that subjects made a compromise between maximum and minimum target’s speed, so that they did hit the target at intermediate speed values. Interestingly, the reliability of target peak velocity (or displacement) modulated the point of interception. When target’s peak velocity was more reliable, subjects intercepted the target at positions with smaller temporal windows and the reverse was true when displacement was reliable. Subjects adapted the interceptive behaviour to the underlying statistical structure of the targets. Finally, in a control condition in which the temporal window also depended on the instant size and not only on speed, subjects intercepted the target when it moved at similar speeds than when the size was constant. This finding suggests that velocity rather than the temporal window contributed more to controlling the interceptive movements.

[1]  J. Tresilian,et al.  a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude , 2022 .

[2]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[3]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Learning Priors for Bayesian Computations in the Nervous System , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Independent control of acceleration and direction of the hand when hitting moving targets. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[5]  B. Rodríguez-Herreros,et al.  The influence of motion signals in hand movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Manual interception of moving targets in two dimensions: Performance and space-time accuracy , 2009, Brain Research.

[7]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[8]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  How timely can our hand movements be? , 2012, Human movement science.

[9]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[10]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Interceptive action: What's time-to-contact got to do with it? , 2004 .

[11]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Dealing with delays does not transfer across sensorimotor tasks. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[12]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  K. Newell,et al.  Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  People Favour Imperfect Catching by Assuming a Stable World , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  H. Heuer,et al.  Motor behavior : programming, control, and acquisition , 1985 .

[17]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Temporal precision of interceptive action: differential effects of target size and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Sources of variability in interceptive movements , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[21]  Karl M Newell,et al.  The movement speed-accuracy relation in space-time. , 2013, Human movement science.

[22]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[24]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Interceptive timing: prior knowledge matters. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[26]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Seeing the last part of a hitting movement is enough to adapt to a temporal delay. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[27]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[28]  R. Schmidt Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Kerry Hourigan,et al.  Wake transition of a rolling sphere , 2011, J. Vis..

[30]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[31]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Prediction of a moving target's position in fast goal-directed action , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Auxiliary object knowledge influences visually-guided interception behavior , 2005, APGV '05.

[33]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Systematic Variation in Performance of an Interceptive Action with Changes in the Temporal Constraints , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[35]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets: Co-operative control of 'when' and 'where' , 1996 .

[36]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..

[37]  E Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving objects. The dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[38]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  How the Statistics of Sequential Presentation Influence the Learning of Structure , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  E. Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.