Frequency of gaps observed in a structurally aligned protein pair database suggests a simple gap penalty function.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Anna R Panchenko,et al. Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[2] D. Lipman,et al. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[3] J. Jung,et al. Protein structure alignment using environmental profiles. , 2000, Protein engineering.
[4] E. Myers,et al. Sequence comparison with concave weighting functions. , 1988, Bulletin of mathematical biology.
[5] T L Blundell,et al. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] B Qian,et al. Distribution of indel lengths , 2001, Proteins.
[7] W. Kabsch,et al. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.
[8] David C. Jones,et al. CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.
[9] S F Altschul,et al. Generalized affine gap costs for protein sequence alignment , 1998, Proteins.
[10] O. Gotoh,et al. Optimal sequence alignment allowing for long gaps , 1990 .
[11] G. Gutman,et al. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.
[12] Xun Gu,et al. The size distribution of insertions and deletions in human and rodent pseudogenes suggests the logarithmic gap penalty for sequence alignment , 1995, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[13] G. Gonnet,et al. Empirical and structural models for insertions and deletions in the divergent evolution of proteins. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[14] Mark Gerstein,et al. Patterns of nucleotide substitution, insertion and deletion in the human genome inferred from pseudogenes. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[15] A G Murzin,et al. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[16] David Eisenberg,et al. The directional atomic solvation energy: An atom-based potential for the assignment of protein sequences to known folds , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] D. Haussler,et al. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] Eugene V Koonin,et al. Evolution of alternative splicing: deletions, insertions and origin of functional parts of proteins from intron sequences. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[19] Golan Yona,et al. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[20] W. A. Beyer,et al. Some Biological Sequence Metrics , 1976 .
[21] Richard Mott. Local sequence alignments with monotonic gap penalties , 1999, Bioinform..
[22] C Sander,et al. Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.
[23] William R. Pearson,et al. Empirical determination of effective gap penalties for sequence comparison , 2002, Bioinform..
[24] T. Blundell,et al. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] S. Karlin,et al. Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Patrice Koehl,et al. The ASTRAL compendium for protein structure and sequence analysis , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..