Effectiveness of Product Warning Labels: Effects of Consumers’ Information Processing Objectives

Based on Wyer and Srull's (1986) model of social information processing, it was hypothesized that compared with consumers who use an impression-set information-processing objective when examining products, consumers using a memory-set processing objective would 1) devote more time to examining products' labels, 2) recall more product information from the label, 3) perceive the products as safer, and 4) be more likely to comply with safety recommendations. Subjects were instructed only once either to memorize as much information as they could or to form an impression from a jar of oven cleaner. After filling out a questionnaire, they examined a jar of prescription cough medicine. Results confirmed the hypotheses for both products. Even though the processing objective instructions were not repeated before the subjects examined the cough medicine, the effects of the objective carried over to the cough medicine.

[1]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[2]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[3]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material , 1982 .

[4]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. , 1983 .

[5]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  Warning Messages: Will the Consumer Bother to Look? , 1983 .

[6]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of control processes and structural constraints in models of memory and social judgment , 1983 .

[7]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[8]  T. K. Srull.  Organizational and retrieval processes in person memory: An examination of processing objectives, presentation format, and the possible role of self-generated retrieval cues , 1983 .

[9]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Conversational Memory The Effects of Time, Recall, Mode, and Memory Expectancies on Remembrances of Natural Conversations , 1984 .

[10]  Kenneth R. Laughery,et al.  The Biasing Effects of Product Familiarity on Consumers' Awareness of Hazard , 1984 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[12]  George B. Sproles,et al.  A methodology for profiling consumers' decision-making styles , 1986 .

[13]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Imperfect Mileage Information and Changing Utility: A Model and Survey Results , 1986 .

[15]  S. David Leonard,et al.  Effects of Benign Experiences on the Perception of Risk , 1986 .

[16]  David M. Sanbonmatsu,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[18]  Thomas K. Srull,et al.  Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment , 1987 .

[19]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  A Market Efficiency Study of Used Car Reliability and Prices , 1987 .