Environmental performance of manure co-digestion with natural and cultivated grass – A consequential life cycle assessment
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H Moora,et al. ELECTRICITY SCENARIOS FOR THE BALTIC STATES AND MARGINAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY IN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENTS - A CASE STUDY OF ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATION , 2009 .
[2] Henrik Wenzel,et al. Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.
[3] A. Normak,et al. Biochemical methane potential of different organic wastes and energy crops from Estonia , 2011 .
[4] Guilherme Marcelo Zanghelini,et al. Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems , 2015 .
[5] Tanka P. Kandel,et al. Chemical composition and methane yield of reed canary grass as influenced by harvesting time and harvest frequency. , 2013, Bioresource technology.
[6] K. Heinsoo,et al. The potential of Estonian semi-natural grasslands for bioenergy production , 2010 .
[7] T. Nemecek,et al. Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .
[8] B. Weidema,et al. A Framework for Modelling Indirect Land Use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment , 2015 .
[9] Visvaldas Varžinskas,et al. Underdog or bulldog: introducing biogas technologies in Estonia , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.
[10] B. Jeangros,et al. Agronomic aspects of biodiversity targeted management of temperate grasslands in Europe - A review , 2005 .
[11] Sara González-García,et al. Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops , 2014 .
[12] Tim Patterson,et al. Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. , 2011, Bioresource technology.
[13] S. Ahlgren,et al. Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union , 2014, Biotechnology for Biofuels.
[14] David Styles,et al. Cattle feed or bioenergy? Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas feedstock options on dairy farms , 2015 .
[15] L. Kukk,et al. Reed canary grass biomass yield and energy use efficiency in Northern European pedoclimatic conditions. , 2011 .
[16] Ottar Michelsen,et al. How Well Does LCA Model Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity?--A Comparison with Approaches from Ecology and Conservation. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.
[17] K. Heinsoo,et al. Seasonal dynamics of bioenergy characteristics in grassland functional groups , 2015 .
[18] Shane Ward,et al. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .
[19] Henrik Wenzel,et al. Carbon footprint of bioenergy pathways for the future Danish energy system , 2014 .
[20] M. T. Knudsen,et al. A comparison of Land Use Change models: challenges and future developments , 2016 .
[21] Morten Birkved,et al. Choosing co-substrates to supplement biogas production from animal slurry--a life cycle assessment of the environmental consequences. , 2014, Bioresource technology.
[22] Martina Poeschl,et al. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: Life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. , 2012 .
[23] Jean-Marc Jossart,et al. Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Bioresource technology.
[24] David Pennington,et al. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[25] Mikko Kolehmainen,et al. A regional model for sustainable biogas electricity production: A case study from a Finnish province , 2013 .
[26] J. Eriksen,et al. Effects of cattle slurry acidification on ammonia and methane evolution during storage. , 2012, Journal of environmental quality.
[27] B. M. Petersen,et al. An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments , 2013 .
[28] Merlin Alvarado-Morales,et al. GHG emission factors for bioelectricity, biomethane, and bioethanol quantified for 24 biomass substrates with consequential life-cycle assessment. , 2016, Bioresource technology.
[29] Henrik Wenzel,et al. Towards increased recycling of household waste: Documenting cascading effects and material efficiency of commingled recyclables and biowaste collection. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.
[30] I. Angelidaki,et al. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.
[31] H. Wenzel,et al. Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas , 2014 .
[32] E. Veromann,et al. Environmental consequences of anaerobic digestion of manure with different co-substrates to produce bioenergy: a review of life cycle assessments. , 2015 .
[33] Nicholas E. Korres,et al. Is grass biomethane a sustainable transport biofuel? , 2010 .
[34] M. Nelles,et al. Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
[35] Jerry D. Murphy,et al. What is the energy balance of grass biomethane in Ireland and other temperate northern European climates , 2009 .
[36] D. Tonini,et al. Environmental implications of the use of agro‐industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land‐use changes , 2016 .
[37] B. Weidema. Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .
[38] Veronica Martinez-Sanchez,et al. Material resources, energy, and nutrient recovery from waste: are waste refineries the solution for the future? , 2013, Environmental science & technology.
[39] Jerry D. Murphy,et al. What is the resource of second generation gaseous transport biofuels based on pig slurries in Spain , 2014 .
[40] Teija Paavola,et al. Biogas production from boreal herbaceous grasses--specific methane yield and methane yield per hectare. , 2009, Bioresource technology.
[41] S. Hoekman,et al. A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy , 2013 .
[42] Sara González-García,et al. Assuring the sustainable production of biogas from anaerobic mono-digestion , 2014 .
[43] H. Wenzel,et al. Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.
[44] K. Heinsoo,et al. Comparison of two different bioenergy production options from late harvested biomass of Estonian semi-natural grasslands , 2013 .
[45] Adisa Azapagic,et al. Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion , 2014 .
[46] L. Hamelin,et al. Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy--a life cycle perspective. , 2012, Bioresource technology.
[47] Pekka Leskinen,et al. Current limits of life cycle assessment framework in evaluating environmental sustainability – case of two evolving biofuel technologies , 2013 .
[48] Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al. Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - the EDIP-2003 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish EPA , 2004 .
[49] Stefano Amaducci,et al. Environmentally Sustainable Biogas? The Key Role of Manure Co-Digestion with Energy Crops , 2015 .
[50] Irini Angelidaki,et al. Manure and energy crops for biogas production : Status and barriers , 2008 .
[51] A. Antón,et al. Towards consensus on land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative preliminary recommendations based on expert contributions , 2016 .