Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI

Previous evidence showed that, due to refocusing of static dephasing effects around large vessels, spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, even at low field. These characteristics suggest that, despite the reduced sensitivity, SE fMRI might also provide a potential benefit when investigating spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity. However, there are no reports on the application of spin-echo fMRI for connectivity studies at low field. In this study we compared resting state functional connectivity as measured with GE and SE EPI sequences at 3T. Main results showed that, within subject, the GE sensitivity is overall larger with respect to that of SE, but to a less extent than previously reported for activation studies. Noteworthy, the reduced sensitivity of SE was counterbalanced by a reduced inter-subject variability, resulting in comparable group statistical connectivity maps for the two sequences. Furthermore, the SE method performed better in the ventral portion of the default mode network, a region affected by signal dropout in standard GE acquisition. Future studies should clarify if these features of the SE BOLD signal can be beneficial to distinguish subtle variations of functional connectivity across different populations and/or treatments when vascular confounds or regions affected by signal dropout can be a critical issue.

[1]  B. Rosen,et al.  Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: Theory and experiment , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Wei Chen,et al.  Investigating the source of BOLD nonlinearity in human visual cortex in response to paired visual stimuli , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Morris,et al.  Loss of Intranetwork and Internetwork Resting State Functional Connections with Alzheimer's Disease Progression , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Christian Schwarzbauer,et al.  Dual echo EPI – The method of choice for fMRI in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging , 2007, Neuron.

[7]  Archana Venkataraman,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Impact of Analysis Methods on the Reproducibility and Reliability of Resting-State Networks , 2013, Brain Connect..

[9]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  David G. Norris,et al.  Spin-echo fMRI: The poor relation? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Discrepancies between BOLD and flow dynamics in primary and supplementary motor areas: application of the balloon model to the interpretation of BOLD transients , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Linearity of blood-oxygenation-level dependent signal at microvasculature , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Spin‐echo and gradient‐echo epi of human brain activation using bold contrast: A comparative study at 1.5 T , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  Roel H. R. Deckers,et al.  Quantifying the spatial resolution of the gradient echo and spin echo BOLD response at 3 Tesla , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[17]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Sensitivity of BOLD response to increasing visual contrast: Spin echo versus gradient echo EPI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Comparison of contrast-response functions from multifocal visual-evoked potentials (mfVEPs) and functional MRI responses. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Effects of biophysical and physiologic parameters on brain activation‐induced R2* and R2 changes: Simulations using a deterministic diffusion model , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[22]  Lirong Yan,et al.  Detecting resting-state brain activity by spontaneous cerebral blood volume fluctuations using whole brain vascular space occupancy imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[23]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Luke Bloy,et al.  Spatial sensitivity and temporal response of spin echo and gradient echo bold contrast at 3 T using peak hemodynamic activation time , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  Peter J. Koopmans,et al.  Whole brain, high resolution spin-echo resting state fMRI using PINS multiplexing at 7T , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  Sungho Tak,et al.  Dynamic and static contributions of the cerebrovasculature to the resting-state BOLD signal , 2014, NeuroImage.

[27]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  K. Davis,et al.  Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[29]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  D P Auer,et al.  Signal undershoots following visual stimulation: A comparison of gradient and spin‐echo BOLD sequences , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Matthew R. Brier,et al.  Network Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: Refining the Disconnection Hypothesis , 2014, Brain Connect..

[34]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[35]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation as measured with gradient- and spin-echo EPI during visual perception , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  Toralf Mildner,et al.  Quantifying the intra‐ and extravascular contributions to spin‐echo fMRI at 3 T , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Daniel A. Handwerker,et al.  Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[40]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  An integrative model for neuronal activity-induced signal changes for gradient and spin echo functional imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  James L. Abelson,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity between Fronto-Parietal and Default Mode Networks in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2012, PloS one.

[43]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Water-Diffusion Slowdown in the Human Visual Cortex on Visual Stimulation Precedes Vascular Responses , 2009, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  B R Rosen,et al.  Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[46]  S. Francis,et al.  Spatial location and strength of BOLD activation in high‐spatial‐resolution fMRI of the motor cortex: a comparison of spin echo and gradient echo fMRI at 7 T , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[47]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  Toralf Mildner,et al.  An Investigation of the Value of Spin-Echo-Based fMRI Using a Stroop Color–Word Matching Task and EPI at 3 T , 2002, NeuroImage.

[49]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[50]  Ajay D. Halai,et al.  A comparison of dual gradient‐echo and spin‐echo fMRI of the inferior temporal lobe , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[51]  A. Snyder,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Intraparietal and Frontal Cortex for Attending, Looking, and Pointing , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Swathi P. Iyer,et al.  Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[54]  Richard J. Binney,et al.  The ventral and inferolateral aspects of the anterior temporal lobe are crucial in semantic memory: evidence from a novel direct comparison of distortion-corrected fMRI, rTMS, and semantic dementia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Luke Bloy,et al.  Temporal resolving power of spin echo and gradient echo fMRI at 3T with apparent diffusion coefficient compartmentalization , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[56]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[57]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls , 2013, NeuroImage.