A numerical study on hurricane‐induced storm surge and inundation in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina

[1] A storm surge and inundation model is configured in Charleston Harbor and its adjacent coastal region to study the harbor's response to hurricanes. The hydrodynamic component of the modeling system is based on the Princeton Ocean Model, and a scheme with multiple inundation speed options is imbedded in the model for the inundation calculation. Historic observations (Hurricane Hugo and its related storm surge and inundation) in the Charleston Harbor region indicate that among three possible inundation speeds in the model, taking Ct (gd)1/2 (Ct is a terrain-related parameter) as the inundation speed is the best choice. Choosing a different inundation speed in the model has effects not only on inundation area but also on storm surge height. A nesting technique is necessary for the model system to capture the mesoscale feature of a hurricane and meanwhile to maintain a higher horizontal resolution in the harbor region, where details of the storm surge and inundation are required. Hurricane-induced storm surge and inundation are very sensitive to storm tracks. Twelve hurricanes with different tracks are simulated to investigate how Charleston Harbor might respond to tracks that are parallel or perpendicular to the coastline or landfall at Charleston at different angles. Experiments show that large differences of storm surge and inundation may have occurred if Hurricane Hugo had approached Charleston Harbor with a slightly different angle. A hurricane's central pressure, radius of maximum wind, and translation speed have their own complicated effects on surge and inundation when the hurricane approaches the coast on different tracks. Systematic experiments are performed in order to illustrate how each of such factors, or a combination of them, may affect the storm surge height and inundation area in the Charleston Harbor region. Finally, suggestions are given on how this numerical model system may be used for hurricane-induced storm surge and inundation forecasting.

[1]  W. Large,et al.  Open Ocean Momentum Flux Measurements in Moderate to Strong Winds , 1981 .

[2]  Michael A. Spall,et al.  A nested primitive equation model for oceanic applications , 1991 .

[3]  Mark D. Powell,et al.  Comparisons of HRD and SLOSH Surface Wind Fields in Hurricanes: Implications for Storm Surge Modeling , 1999 .

[4]  G. Holland.  An Analytic Model of the Wind and Pressure Profiles in Hurricanes , 1980 .

[5]  Zhongde Yan,et al.  A Note on the Radius of Maximum Wind for Hurricanes , 1998 .

[6]  Kathleen L. McInnes,et al.  A storm surge inundation model for coastal planning and impact studies , 1999 .

[7]  C. Jelesnianski,et al.  SLOSH - A Hurricane Storm Surge Forecast Model , 1984 .

[8]  B. Sumer,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of the ventilated wave boundary layer , 2006 .

[9]  Costas E. Synolakis,et al.  The runup of solitary waves , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Kwok Fai Cheung,et al.  Modeling of tropical cyclone winds and waves for emergency management , 2003 .

[11]  S. J. Maskell,et al.  Two-Way Interactive Nesting of Primitive Equation Ocean Models with Topography , 1995 .

[12]  G. Mellor.  USERS GUIDE for A THREE-DIMENSIONAL, PRIMITIVE EQUATION, NUMERICAL OCEAN MODEL , 1998 .

[13]  James A. Liggett,et al.  Boundary integral equation solutions for solitary wave generation, propagation and run-up , 1983 .

[14]  Lian Xie,et al.  A numerical study of storm surge and inundation in the Croatan–Albemarle–Pamlico Estuary System , 2004 .

[15]  Lian Xie,et al.  Incorporation of a Mass-Conserving Inundation Scheme into a Three Dimensional Storm Surge Model , 2004 .

[16]  Lie-Yauw Oey,et al.  A wetting and drying scheme for POM , 2005 .

[17]  R. Crout,et al.  LOW-FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF ESTUARINE SEA LEVEL TO NON-LOCAL FORCING , 1978 .

[18]  Geir Pedersen,et al.  Run-up of solitary waves , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  C. Jelesnianski,et al.  SLOSH: Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes , 1992 .