Review of Empirical Research on Congested Freeway Flow

In a review of the empirical literature on congested freeway flow, with special emphasis on topics of current interest, including congested flow phases, congested-regime flow-concentration relationships, wave speeds, average time-gap behavior, and transitions between uncongested and congested flow, the most striking feature of the results is their diversity. Shapes of flow-concentration relationships vary among studies and sites, wave speeds vary, patterns of repetition in congested flow appear to vary widely, and flow breakdown occurs at a variety of locations and for a variety of reasons. The diversity of results seems to indicate a similar diversity of phenomena rather than the effect of methodological differences. For the most part, methodologies are simple and intuitive, and because of their simplicity, they are unlikely to result in variability of the magnitude found in the results. Several methodological features that could possibly distort results are noted but do not appear to be responsible for the diversity of results. A major limitation of research to date is a lack of systematic understanding of the relative frequency of occurrence of different congested-flow phenomena. Because abundant loop-detector data are now available, research into the frequencies of congested-flow phenomena is feasible; however, analysis of very large quantities of data will be required.

[1]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY DROP AND THE DEFINITION OF CAPACITY , 1991 .

[2]  Dirk Helbing Empirical traffic data and their implications for traffic modeling , 1997 .

[3]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[5]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Evaluation of Single Vehicle Data in Dependence of the Vehicle-Type, Lane, and Site , 2000 .

[6]  T. W. Forbes,et al.  Driver-and-Vehiele Response in Freeway Deceleration Waves , 1968 .

[7]  James I Taylor,et al.  TRAFFIC FLOW INVESTIGATIONS BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUES , 1966 .

[8]  L Newman TRAFFIC OPERATION AT TWO INTERCHANGES IN CALIFORNIA , 1963 .

[9]  J Treiterer,et al.  THE HYSTERESIS PHENOMENON IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1974 .

[10]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[11]  Kerner,et al.  Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  Kerner,et al.  Experimental properties of complexity in traffic flow. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Yong Shi,et al.  SOME OBSERVATIONS ON SPEED-FLOW AND FLOW-OCCUPANCY RELATIONSHIPS UNDER CONGESTED CONDITIONS , 1993 .

[14]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  EVALUATION OF HIGH-VOLUME URBAN TEXAS FREEWAYS , 1991 .

[15]  H. Mika,et al.  DUAL MODE BEHAVIOR OF FREEWAY TRAFFIC , 1969 .

[16]  Boris S. Kerner,et al.  Theory of Breakdown Phenomenon at Highway Bottlenecks , 2000 .

[17]  James H Banks,et al.  TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON AT FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS: A BASIS FOR RAMP METERING? , 1991 .

[18]  J. Banks THE TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON: SOME THEORETICAL ISSUES , 1991 .

[19]  James H Banks,et al.  SYNTHESIS OF RECENT WORK ON THE NATURE OF SPEED-FLOW AND FLOW-OCCUPANCY (OR DENSITY) RELATIONSHIPS ON FREEWAYS , 1992 .

[20]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic , 1999 .

[21]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  EVALUATION OF SPEED ESTIMATES MADE WITH SINGLE-DETECTOR DATA FROM FREEWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1989 .

[22]  Masato Iwasaki EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF CONGESTED TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AND FREE SPEED AFFECTED BY GEOMETRIC FACTORS ON AN INTERCITY EXPRESSWAY , 1991 .

[23]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF MULTI-LANE TRAFFIC FLOW. PART II, MERGES AND THE ONSET OF CONGESTION , 1999 .

[24]  B. Kerner,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL PROPERTIES OF PHASE TRANSITIONS IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1997 .

[25]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Breakdown-Related Capacity for Freeway with Ramp Metering , 2001 .

[26]  J. Banks ANOTHER LOOK AT A PRIORI RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTICS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1995 .

[27]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  Car-Following Under Congested Conditions: Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[28]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Exploration of the Breakdown Phenomenon in Freeway Traffic , 1998 .

[29]  K. Kockelman Changes in Flow-Density Relationship Due to Environmental, Vehicle, and Driver Characteristics , 1998 .

[30]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  STUDY OF FREEWAY BOTTLENECKS IN TEXAS , 1993 .

[31]  V F Hurdle,et al.  SOME NEW DATA THAT CHALLENGE SOME OLD IDEAS ABOUT SPEED-FLOW RELATIONSHIPS , 1988 .

[32]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF MULTI-LANE TRAFFIC FLOW. PART I, LONG HOMOGENEOUS FREEWAY SECTIONS , 1999 .

[33]  R S Foote,et al.  EFFECT OF SHOCK WAVES ON TUNNEL TRAFFIC FLOW , 1960 .

[34]  B. Kerner EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES OF SELF-ORGANIZATION IN TRAFFIC FLOW , 1998 .

[35]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Probabilistic nature of breakdown at freeway merge junctions , 1995 .

[36]  J H Banks EVALUATION OF THE TWO-CAPACITY PHENOMENON AS A BASIS FOR RAMP METERING. FINAL REPORT , 1990 .

[37]  James H Banks Investigation of Some Characteristics of Congested Flow , 1999 .

[38]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CONGESTED FLOW ON A FREEWAY ACROSS LANES, SPACE AND TIME , 1988 .