No Need for Speed: Modeling Trend Adoption in a Heterogeneous Population

The speed of social and technological changes is constantly increasing. Change is a pre-requisite for economic development but this increasing speed carries additional costs that may largely affect the ability of the social systems to adopt them. While the financial costs constitute a limit to adoption, the psychological and social costs may also profoundly change the adoption potential. In an agent-based model of a heterogeneous population of adopters we explore the consequences of increasing the speed of novelty introduction on their satisfaction and the degree to which new trends may permeate the system. We show that introduction speed has a diametrically different impact on different adopter groups: opinion leaders are most satisfied when the mainstream individuals are least content and vice versa. Moreover, introduction speed profoundly affects the ability of trends to penetrate the system — the lower the introduction speed, the higher the level of penetration of the social system. With high speed of introduction, only a small fraction of the most attractive novelties is able to permeate the system. In sum, these results show that both the wellbeing of the social system as well as its capacity to adopt novelties are dependent on the speed of change.

[1]  H. Gerth,et al.  The Sociology of Georg Simmel. , 1950 .

[2]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[3]  P. Slater,et al.  Role differentiation in small groups. , 1955 .

[4]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[5]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[6]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[7]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[8]  B. Berelson,et al.  Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific Findings , 1964 .

[9]  Paul McReynolds,et al.  The “Need for Novelty”: A Comparison of Six Instruments , 1967 .

[10]  P. Suppes,et al.  Human behavior: An inventory of scientific findings. , 1967 .

[11]  F. Farley,et al.  Extroversion and stimulus-seeking motivation. , 1967, Journal of consulting psychology.

[12]  H. Fromkin Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd ed. , 1971 .

[14]  John A. Czepiel Word-of-Mouth Processes in the Diffusion of a Major Technological Innovation , 1974 .

[15]  E. Faison The Neglected Variety Drive: A Useful Concept for Consumer Behavior , 1977 .

[16]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[17]  E. Hirschman Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity , 1980 .

[18]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[19]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Working papers in the theory of action , 1981 .

[20]  J. L. Gould,et al.  TIT FOR TAT , 1984 .

[21]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[22]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[23]  B. Burnes,et al.  Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change , 1995 .

[24]  Wolfgang Pesendorfer,et al.  Design Innovation and Fashion Cycles , 1995 .

[25]  T. Valente Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[26]  D. Kirsh A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload , 2000 .

[27]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[28]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[29]  Stephen J Shennan,et al.  Random drift and culture change , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test , 2004 .

[31]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  Technical Report: Want to know how diffusion speed varies across countries and products? Try using a Bass model , 2005 .

[32]  H. Daly,et al.  Economics in a full world , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[33]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  The power of a good idea: Quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models , 2005, physics/0502067.

[34]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[35]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Regular rates of popular culture change reflect random copying , 2007 .

[36]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[37]  G. Silverberg,et al.  A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies , 2009 .

[38]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[39]  Jonah A. Berger,et al.  How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[41]  Tim Jackson Beyond the Growth Economy , 2009 .

[42]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions , 2010 .

[43]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of topics across disciplines? , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[44]  Lingnan He,et al.  The pursuit of optimal distinctiveness and consumer preferences. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[45]  Paul Ormerod,et al.  Ex ante prediction of cascade sizes on networks of agents facing binary outcomes , 2011, ArXiv.

[46]  P. Leeflang,et al.  Opinion Leaders' Role in Innovation Diffusion: A Simulation Study , 2011 .

[47]  C. Graham The Pursuit of Happiness: An Economy of Well-Being , 2011 .

[48]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  The Critical Few: Anticonformists at the Crossroads of Minority Opinion Survival and Collapse , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..