Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007

There is some panic in the United States about a possible decline in social connectivity. The authors used two American national surveys to analyze how changes in the number of friends are related to changes in Internet use. The authors found that friendships continue to be abundant among adult Americans between the ages of 25 to 74 and that they grew from 2002 to 2007. This trend is similar among Internet nonusers, light users, moderate users, and heavy users and across communication contexts: offline, virtual only, and migratory from online to offline. Heavy users are particularly active, having the most friends both online and offline. Intracohort change consistently outweighs cohort replacement in explaining overall growth in friendship.

[1]  S. Bastani.  Muslim Women On-Line , 2011 .

[2]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Small Town in the Internet Society: Chapleau Is No Longer an Island , 2010 .

[3]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact? , 2009 .

[4]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Models and Marginals: Using Survey Evidence to Study Social Networks , 2009 .

[5]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Generations online in 2009 , 2009 .

[6]  W. Dutton,et al.  Social interaction and the Internet , 2009 .

[7]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  AGENCY IN SOCIAL ACTIVITY INTERACTIONS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN TIME AND SPACE , 2008 .

[8]  Michael J. Stern,et al.  HOW LOCALITY, FREQUENCY OF COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET USAGE AFFECT MODES OF COMMUNICATION WITHIN CORE SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[9]  B. Wellman,et al.  Does Distance Matter in the Age of the Internet? , 2008 .

[10]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Technology, genres, and value change: Literary authors and artistic use of information technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Keeping in touch by technology: maintaining friendships after a residential move , 2008, CHI.

[12]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Global Villagers: Comparing Internet Users and Uses Around the World , 2008 .

[14]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  Seven Rules for Social Research , 2008 .

[15]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  William H. Dutton,et al.  Reconfiguring Friendships: Social relationships and the Internet , 2007 .

[18]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , 2007 .

[20]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  The Internet and Social Participation: Contrasting Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[23]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[24]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Slouching Toward the Ordinary: Current Trends in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004, New Media Soc..

[25]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb , 2003 .

[27]  L. Kendall.  Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online , 2002 .

[28]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[29]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[30]  Mark A. Sutton,et al.  Too much of a good thing , 2001, Nature.

[31]  B. Wellman.  Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[32]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..

[33]  D. Harman.  Aging: Phenomena and Theories , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[35]  James E. Katz,et al.  A nation of strangers? , 1997, CACM.

[36]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[37]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Masao Nobe,et al.  The Community Question , 1991 .

[39]  C. Marvin,et al.  When Old Technologies Were New , 2010 .

[40]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[41]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[42]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  S. M. McCune,et al.  American Behavioral Scientist , 1977 .

[44]  C. Fischer.  "Urbanism as a Way of Life" , 1972 .

[45]  Aric Sigman,et al.  Well connected ? The biological implications of ‘ social networking , 2009 .

[46]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Nonverbal Dynamics in Computer-Mediated Communication or: (And the Net: ('S with You, :) and You :) Alone , 2006 .

[47]  B. Buunk,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships , 2006 .

[48]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[49]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet , 2006 .

[50]  Elena Maceviciute,et al.  Review of: Einspruch, Eric L. An introductory guide to SPSS® for Windows®. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..

[51]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication Technology and Friendship During the Transition From High School to College , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[52]  Isaac Prilleltensky,et al.  Community and Power , 2005 .

[53]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Neighboring in Netville: , 2003 .

[54]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[55]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  PROJECT SYNTOPIA: SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF INTERNET USE , 2002 .

[56]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Introduction: The social shaping and consequences of ICTs , 2002 .

[57]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[58]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  Analyzing Repeated Surveys , 1997 .

[59]  Jan A.G.M. van Dijk,et al.  The network society , 1997 .

[60]  A. Caelleigh,et al.  The machine in the garden. , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[61]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen , 1995 .

[62]  M. Mcluhan,et al.  The Global village , 1990 .

[63]  R. W. Burns.  When Old Technologies Were New , 1989 .

[64]  C. Fischer.  To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[65]  R. Wik,et al.  The Devil's Wagon in God's Country , 1981 .

[66]  William J. Kessler,et al.  Keeping in Touch with Technology. , 1974 .

[67]  Descriptors Higher.  Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association , 1974 .

[68]  A. Bolaji Akinyemi,et al.  The social implications , 1971 .

[69]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Multiple classification analysis , 1967 .

[70]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .