The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification.

[1]  Willard R. Thurlow,et al.  The effects of eye position and expectation on sound localization , 1971 .

[2]  W Epstein,et al.  Adaptation to uniocular image magnification: modification of the disparity-depth relationship. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  H. Wallach,et al.  Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues , 1972 .

[4]  W. Clark,et al.  Retinal gradient of outline as a stimulus for slant. , 1955, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  Arjen Mack.  The role of movement in perceptual adaptation to a tilted retinal image , 1967 .

[6]  E Efstathiou.  Effects of exposure time and magnitude of prism transform on eye-hand coordination. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  W Epstein.  Retention of adaptation to uniocular image magnification: effect of interpolated activity. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  S M Ebenholtz,et al.  Adaptation to a rotated visual field as a function of degree of optical tilt and exposure time. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  R H Day,et al.  Spatial adaptation and aftereffect with optically transformed vision: effects of active and passive responding and the relationship between test and exposure responses. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. B. Morant,et al.  Adaptation to Prismatically Rotated Visual Fields , 1965, Science.

[11]  K. N. Ogle.  Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[12]  L. K. Canon,et al.  Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  W Epstein.  Adaptation to uniocular image magnification after varying preadaptation activities. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Absolute threshold for visual slant: the effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.