Experimental analysis on the impact force of viscous debris flow

A miniaturized flume experiment was carried out to measure impact forces of viscous debris flow. The flow depth (7.2-11.2 cm), velocity (2.4-5.2 m/s) and impact force were recorded during the experiment. The impact process of debris flow can be divided into three phases by analyzing the variation of impact signals and flow regime. The three phases are the sudden strong impact of the debris flow head, continuous dynamic pressure of the body and slight static pressure of the tail. The variation of impact process is consistent with the change in the flow regime. The head has strong-rapid impact pressure, which is shown as a turbulent-type flow; the body approximates to steady laminar flow. Accordingly, the process of debris flows hitting structures was simplified to a triangle shape, ignoring the pressure of the tail. In order to study the distribution of the debris flow impact force at different depths and variation of the impact process over time, the impact signals of slurry and coarse particles were separated from the original signals using wavelet analysis. The slurry's dynamic pressure signal appears to be a smooth curve, and the peak pressure is 12-34 kPa when the debris flow head hits the sensors, which is about 1.54 +/- 0.36 times the continuous dynamic pressure of the debris flow body. The limit of application of the empirical parameter a in the hydraulic formula was also noted. We introduced the power function relationship of a and the Froude number of debris flows, and proposed a universal model for calculating dynamic pressure. The impact pressure of large particles has the characteristic of randomness. The mean frequency of large particles impacting the sensor is 210 +/- 50-287 +/- 29 times per second, and it is 336 +/- 114-490 +/- 69 times per second for the debris flow head, which is greater than that in the debris flow body. Peak impact pressure of particles at different flow depths is 40-160 kPa, which is 3.2 +/- 1.5 times the impact pressure of the slurry at the bottom of the flow, 3.1 +/- 0.9 times the flow in the middle, and 3.3 +/- 0.9 times the flow at the surface. The differences in impact frequency indicate that most of the large particles concentrate in the debris flow head, and the number of particles in the debris flow head increases with height. This research supports the study of solid-liquid two phase flow mechanisms, and helps engineering design and risk assessment in debris flow prone areas. (C) 2015 The Authors. Earth Surface Proccesses and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Armanini,et al.  Dynamic impact of a debris flow front against a vertical wall , 2011 .

[2]  石川 信隆,et al.  Experimental approach on measurement of impulsive fluid force using debris flow model , 2008 .

[3]  F. Wei,et al.  Real‐time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris‐flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, China , 2011 .

[4]  Hiroshi Suwa,et al.  Observation System on Rocky Mudflow , 1973 .

[5]  C. Wendeler,et al.  Field measurements used for numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers , 2007 .

[6]  Dirk Proske,et al.  Debris flow impact estimation for breakers , 2011 .

[7]  Experimental analysis on the hydraulic efficiency of mudflow breakers , 2004 .

[8]  L. Franzi,et al.  On the evaluation of debris flows dynamics by means of mathematical models , 2003 .

[9]  D. Proske,et al.  Analysing Debris-Flow Impact Models, Based on a Small Scale Modelling Approach , 2012, Surveys in Geophysics.

[10]  Kaiheng Hu,et al.  Measuring the internal velocity of debris flows using impact pressure detecting in the flume experiment , 2011 .

[11]  P. Cui,et al.  Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact , 2015, Landslides.

[12]  Tamotsu Takahashi,et al.  Debris Flow: Mechanics, Prediction and Countermeasures , 2007 .

[13]  John E. Costa,et al.  Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows , 1984 .

[14]  Roberto Santacroce,et al.  Characteristics of May 5–6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation , 2004 .

[15]  Self-organization criticality of debris flow rheology , 2003 .

[16]  A. Armanini On the dynamic impact of debris flows , 1997 .

[17]  P. Bartelt,et al.  Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles , 2012, Landslides.

[18]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  Experimental analysis of the impact of dry avalanches on structures and implication for debris flows , 2006 .

[19]  Chen Hong-kai,et al.  Method to Calculate Impact Force and Impact Time of Two-Phase Debris Flow , 2006 .

[20]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  Analysis of Debris Wave Development with One-Dimensional Shallow-Water Equations , 2004 .

[21]  Shucheng Zhang,et al.  A Comprehensive Approach to the Observation and Prevention of Debris Flows in China , 1993 .

[22]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures , 1984 .

[23]  Alfred Strauss,et al.  Safety assessment of barrier structures , 2009 .

[24]  Li Xiaoyu FIELD MEASUREMENT OF IMPACT FORCE OF DEBRIS FLOW , 2006 .