Using complex networks analysis to assess the evolution of international economic integration: The cases of East Asia and Latin America

This paper exploits recently-developed indicators based on network analysis to investigate the pattern of international integration followed by East Asian countries and compares it with the Latin American performance. Standard trade openness indicators fall short of portraying the peculiarity of the Asian experience, and of explaining why other emerging markets with similar characteristics have been less successful over the last 25 years. The analysis offers an alternative perspective on the issue regarding international economic integration by taking into account the whole structure of international trade relationships and by determining both the position of countries in the world trade network, and its evolution over time. We find that East Asian countries are more integrated into the world economy, as they have moved from the periphery of the network towards its core. Our results support the idea that the degree of openness matters but it is not enough to characterize economic integration. The number and identity of trade partners, and the specific individual structure of trade for each country, need to be incorporated in order to fully characterize international economic integration. By doing so, it is possible to argue that the integration process of the East Asian countries mirrors their high economic performance, while the lower degree of integration of Latin America can be related to the lack of economic development of the region, even though their degree of openness has increased.

[1]  Jong‐Wha Lee,et al.  Growth and Adjustment in East Asia and Latin America , 2004 .

[2]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Overcoming Informational Barriers to International Resource Allocation: Prices and Ties , 2001 .

[3]  G. Fagiolo,et al.  The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Ching-yuan Lin,et al.  Latin America vs East Asia: A Comparative Development Perspective , 1989 .

[5]  Ugo Panizza,et al.  Structural Reforms in Latin America Under Scrutiny , 2002 .

[6]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Evolution and structure of the Internet , 2004 .

[7]  P. Messerlin,et al.  Trade Policy Regimes and Development Strategies: A Comparative Study , 2002 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  Managing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets , 2003 .

[9]  D. Romer,et al.  Does Trade Cause Growth , 1999 .

[10]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Structure and evolution of the world trade network , 2005, physics/0502066.

[11]  Jose De Gregorio Economic growth in Latin America , 1991 .

[12]  Raja Kali,et al.  Trade structure and economic growth , 2007 .

[13]  Roberto Perotti,et al.  Fiscal Policy in Latin America , 1997, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[14]  Jeffrey D. Sachs,et al.  External Debt and Macroeconomic Performance in Latin America and East Asia , 1985 .

[15]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Agglomeration and Trade Revisited , 2002, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[16]  S. Battiston,et al.  Credit Chains and Bankruptcy Propagation in Production Networks , 2007 .

[17]  San Luis Obispo,et al.  The Linchpins of a Modern Economy , 2006 .

[18]  A. Vamvakidis,et al.  IMF Working Paper African and European Departments How Much Do Trading Partners Matter for Economic Growth ? , 2004 .

[19]  Javier Reyes,et al.  The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration , 2006 .

[20]  John Weeks,et al.  Latin America and the "High Performing Asian Economies": Growth and Debt , 2000 .

[21]  K. Gleditsch,et al.  Expanded Trade and GDP Data , 2002 .

[22]  Marián Boguñá,et al.  Topology of the world trade web. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  R. Barro,et al.  Economic Growth in East Asia Before and after the Financial Crisis , 2001 .

[24]  Giorgio Fagiolo Directed or Undirected? A New Index to Check for Directionality of Relations in Socio-Economic Networks , 2006 .

[25]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Fitness-dependent topological properties of the world trade web. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[26]  Carmen M. Reinhart,et al.  Financial crises in Asia and Latin America: Then and now , 1998 .

[27]  Sangmoon Kim,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Globalization and Regionalization in International Trade: A Social Network Approach , 2002 .

[28]  Theodore A. Scambos,et al.  The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations , 2007 .

[29]  Ronald L. Breiger,et al.  Structures of Economic Interdependence among Nations , 1982 .

[30]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  Why isn't the whole world experimenting with the East Asian model to develop?: Review of the East Asian miracle , 1994 .

[32]  Jason Hwang,et al.  What you export matters , 2005 .

[33]  Mark E. J. Newman A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[34]  對外經濟政策研究院,et al.  The Spoke Trap: hub and spoke bilateralism in East Asia , 2004 .

[35]  Patricio Rojas,et al.  Investment, macroeconomic stability and growth: the latin american experience , 1993 .

[36]  David A. Smith,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980 , 1992 .

[37]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[38]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  Sebastian Edwards,et al.  Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope , 1997 .

[40]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[41]  Raja Kali,et al.  Financial Contagion on the International Trade Network , 2005 .

[42]  Ajit Singh,et al.  Savings, Investment and the Corporation in the East Asian Miracle , 1998, East Asian Development: New Perspectives.

[43]  S. Goyal,et al.  Economics: An Emerging Small World , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[44]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[45]  J. Weiss Industrial Policy in the Twenty-First Century : Challenges for the Future , 2011 .

[46]  E. Kick,et al.  Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955-1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  On the Topological Properties of the World Trade Web: A Weighted Network Analysis , 2007, 0708.4359.

[48]  James E. Rauch Business and Social Networks in International Trade , 2001 .

[49]  Victor Krasilshchikov,et al.  The East Asian 'Tigers': Following Russia and Latin , 2010 .

[50]  Stanley Fischer,et al.  The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth , 1993 .

[51]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[52]  G. Fagiolo Clustering in complex directed networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.