Neurophysiologische Parameter zum Sprachverstehen von Patienten mit Cochlea-Implantaten
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Malliaras,et al. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of human cochleas for modeling cochlear implant electrical stimulus spread , 2020, APL materials.
[2] U. Hoppe,et al. Cochlear Implantation in Candidates With Moderate‐to‐Severe Hearing Loss and Poor Speech Perception , 2020, The Laryngoscope.
[3] S. T. Goverts,et al. Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users , 2019, Ear and hearing.
[4] A. Otero,et al. Patienten Outcome bei ambulanter Therapie nach Cochlea-Implantation im Hinblick auf audiologische Ergebnisse und Angaben über den Inhalt der logopädischen Therapie , 2019 .
[5] U. Hoppe,et al. [Maximum monosyllabic score as a predictor for cochlear implant outcome]. , 2019, HNO.
[6] Thomas Lenarz,et al. Cochlear implant – state of the art , 2018, GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.
[7] D. Sladen,et al. Cochlear Implant Associated Labyrinthitis: A Previously Unrecognized Phenomenon With a Distinct Clinical and Electrophysiological Impedance Pattern. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[8] H. Hessel,et al. [Loudness optimized registration of compound action potential in cochlear implant recipients]. , 2017, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.
[9] U. Hoppe,et al. Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages , 2016, Audiology and Neurotology.
[10] X. Xi,et al. Effects of cochlear implant surgical technique on post-operative electrode impedance , 2016, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[11] U. Hoppe,et al. Speech Perception of Elderly Cochlear Implant Users Under Different Noise Conditions , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[12] J. Frijns,et al. Population-Based Prediction of Fitting Levels for Individual Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.
[13] M. P. Moeller,et al. Performance Outcomes for Borderline Cochlear Implant Recipients With Substantial Preoperative Residual Hearing , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[14] M. Praetorius,et al. Neues aus der Hörforschung , 2014, HNO.
[15] M. Liberman,et al. Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.
[16] Karen M Mispagel,et al. Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[17] L. De Raeve,et al. Accessibility to cochlear implants in Belgium: State of the art on selection, reimbursement, habilitation, and outcomes in children and adults , 2013, Cochlear implants international.
[18] A. Beynon,et al. Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients , 2012, Audiology and Neurotology.
[19] H. Francis,et al. Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation in Older Adults: Literature Review and Proposal of a Conceptual Framework , 2012, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
[20] B. Mazurek,et al. Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress , 2012, The Laryngoscope.
[21] Jill B Firszt,et al. Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system , 2011, International journal of audiology.
[22] René H. Gifford,et al. Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[23] B. Papsin,et al. Packing of the Cochleostomy Site Affects Auditory Nerve Response Thresholds in Precurved Off-Stylet Cochlear Implants , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[24] M. Liberman,et al. Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[25] J. Fayad,et al. Histopathologic Assessment of Fibrosis and nEw Bone Formation in Implanted Human Temporal Bones Using 3D Reconstruction , 2009, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery.
[26] Sarah F. Poissant,et al. Impact of cochlear implantation on speech understanding, depression, and loneliness in the elderly. , 2008, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.
[27] M. Dorman,et al. Performance of Patients Using Different Cochlear Implant Systems: Effects of Input Dynamic Range , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[28] D. Mawman,et al. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years 1 , 2006 .
[29] R T Ramsden,et al. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.
[30] F B van der Beek,et al. Clinical Evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and Without Positioner , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[31] E. Kang,et al. Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation over a 4-Year Time Period , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[32] Edward H. Overstreet,et al. Neural Response Imaging : Measuring Auditory-Nerve Responses from the Cochlea with the HiResolution TM Bionic Ear System , 2003 .
[33] N. Kraus,et al. Neurophysiology of Cochlear Implant Users II: Comparison Among Speech Perception, Dynamic Range, and Physiological Measures , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[34] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] M. J. Osberger,et al. Adult Cochlear Implant Patient Performance with Evolving Electrode Technology , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.
[36] P J Abbas,et al. The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[37] P C Loizou,et al. The Effect of Reduced Dynamic Range on Speech Understanding: Implications for Patients with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[38] G M Clark,et al. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. , 1998, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[39] G M Clark,et al. Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[40] M. Liberman. Central projections of auditory nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate, II: Posteroventral and dorsal cochlear nuclei , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.
[41] Kiyoshi Honda,et al. Factors Contributing to Phoneme Recognition Ability of Users of the 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[42] M. Liberman. Central projections of auditory‐nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate. I. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.