Uniqueness of radiographic patterns of the frontal sinus for personal identification

Purpose This study was performed to evaluate the uniqueness and reliability of the frontal sinuses by comparing various patterns of frontal sinus as observed on Waters' radiographs for individual identification. Materials and Methods Three Waters' radiographs of 100 individuals, taken on day one, after 6-8 months, and one radiograph with a slight variation in angulation, to mimic conditions out in the field or during autopsy. Three observers were randomly given radiographs from all there packets for comparisons and identification, by the method of superimposition and individual uniqueness. Results The comparative identification by superimposition of the frontal sinus was 100% positive. The size, shape, unilateral or bilateral presence, absence, and septa were observed to be unique in each case; neither had the measurements changed over a period of time. Conclusion The need to establish a reliable, low-cost, and easily reproducible method for human identification prompted the elaboration of technical, precise, and accessible parameters, such as the evaluation of the area, asymmetry, and shape of the frontal sinus. Comparison among each of the frontal sinuses of the 100 people in the sample revealed that no two sinuses are the same, that is, the sinus is unique to each individual.

[1]  Angi M Christensen,et al.  Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  Jian-Pin Tang,et al.  Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[3]  Arthur Schuller,et al.  A NOTE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF SKULLS BY X‐RAY PICTURES OF THE FRONTAL SINUSES , 1943 .

[4]  G Quatrehomme,et al.  Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[5]  A. Aslan,et al.  CT study on morphometry of frontal sinus , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[6]  F de A Ribeiro,et al.  Standardized measurements of radiographic films of the frontal sinuses: an aid to identifying unknown persons. , 2000, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[7]  P. Donald,et al.  Frontal sinus fractures: A review of 72 cases , 1988 .

[8]  M. A. Clark,et al.  Identification of human remains by comparison of frontal sinus radiographs: a series of four cases. , 1991, Journal of Forensic Sciences.

[9]  Commentary on: Cox M, Malcolm M. Fairgrieve SI. A new digital method for the objective comparison of frontal sinuses for identification. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):761–72 , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  L. Kullman,et al.  Value of the frontal sinus in identification of unknown persons. , 1990, The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology.

[11]  Scott I Fairgrieve,et al.  A New Digital Method for the Objective Comparison of Frontal Sinuses for Identification * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  S Miyasaka,et al.  Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. , 1987, Forensic science international.

[13]  A. Nahum.  The biomechanics of maxillofacial trauma. , 1975, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[14]  P. Igbigbi,et al.  Determination of Sex and Race from the Subpubic Angle in Ugandan Subjects , 2003, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[15]  P. Nambiar,et al.  Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification , 1999, Clinical anatomy.