Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery

A great medicine is one that effectively treats or prevents disease and has no adverse effects. Despite well-regulated registration environments for proving efficacy and safety, adverse events (eg, adverse drug reactions, ADRs) can be unpredictable and a medicine is rarely effective in all patients. Neither those who pay for medical care nor patients want drugs to be prescribed that do not benefit the recipient. Pharmacogenetics has the promise of removing much of the uncertainty. Physicians will be able to use a medicine response profile to predict an individual’s likely response before a medicine is prescribed. Although not immediately obvious, the pharmaceutical industry and the public should also benefit by faster and more efficient clinical trials, more treatments for more patients, reduced costs of drug development, expansion of research to cover more diseases, and improved drug surveillance. The first step is to acknowledge shortfalls in current regulatory systems and the potential of pharmacogenetics to meet those shortfalls. A phased system of regulatory change could be considered, as the anticipated scientific developments become available. It is therefore useful to define the terms and techniques that will allow this process to be designed, piloted, and established.

[1]  A. Roses The Alzheimer diseases , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  A D Roses,et al.  Apolipoprotein E alleles as risk factors in Alzheimer's disease. , 1996, Annual review of medicine.

[3]  Daniel L. Koller,et al.  Familial multiple-system tauopathy with presenile dementia is localized to chromosome 17. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  E Lai,et al.  A 4-Mb high-density single nucleotide polymorphism-based map around human APOE. , 1998, Genomics.

[5]  R. Crowther,et al.  α-Synuclein in filamentous inclusions of Lewy bodies from Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies , 1998 .

[6]  J. Haines,et al.  Further evidence linking late-onset Alzheimer disease with chromosome 12. , 1999, JAMA.

[7]  S. Sullivan,et al.  Incorporating clinical outcomes and economic consequences into drug formulary decisions: a practical approach. , 1999, The American journal of managed care.

[8]  Jason Lazarou,et al.  Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients , 1999 .

[9]  C. Stein,et al.  Making medicines safer--the need for an independent drug safety board. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Brookes The essence of SNPs. , 1999, Gene.

[11]  J. Todd,et al.  Molecular genetics of diabetes mellitus. , 1995, Bailliere's clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[12]  J W Jukema,et al.  The role of a common variant of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein gene in the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The Regression Growth Evaluation Statin Study Group. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Brian Lipworth,et al.  Association between β2-adrenoceptor polymorphism and susceptibility to bronchodilator desensitisation in moderately severe stable asthmatics , 1997, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Witte,et al.  Clinical trials in the genomic era: effects of protective genotypes on sample size and duration of trial. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.