Water molecules participate in proteinase‐inhibitor interactions: Crystal structures of Leu18, Ala18, and Gly18 variants of turkey ovomucoid inhibitor third domain complexed with Streptomyces griseus proteinase B

Crystal structures of the complexes of Streptomyces griseus proteinase B (SGPB) with three P1 variants of turkey ovomucoid inhibitor third domain (OMTKY3), Leu18, Ala18, and Gly18, have been determined and refined to high resolution. Comparisons among these structures and of each with native, uncomplexed SGPB reveal that each complex features a unique solvent structure in the S1 binding pocket. The number and relative positions of water molecules bound in the S1 binding pocket vary according to the size of the side chain of the P1 residue. Water molecules in the S1 binding pocket of SGPB are redistributed in response to the complex formation, probably to optimize hydrogen bonds between the enzyme and the inhibitor. There are extensive water‐mediated hydrogen bonds in the interfaces of the complexes. In all complexes, Asn 36 of OMTKY3 participates in forming hydrogen bonds, via water molecules, with residues lining the S1 binding pocket of SGPB. For a homologous series of aliphatic straight side chains, Gly18, Ala18, Abu18, Ape18, Ahx18, and Ahp18 variants, the binding free energy is a linear function of the hydrophobic surface area buried in the interface of the corresponding complexes. The resulting constant of proportionality is 34.1 cal mol−1 Å−2. These structures confirm that the binding of OMTKY3 to the preformed S1 pocket in SGPB involves no substantial structural disturbances that commonly occur in the site‐directed mutagenesis studies of interior residues in other proteins, thus providing one of the most reliable assessments of the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein‐complex stability.

[1]  T. Clackson,et al.  A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface , 1995, Science.

[2]  A. Berger,et al.  On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. , 1967, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  S. Anderson,et al.  Arg15-Lys17-Arg18 turkey ovomucoid third domain inhibits human furin. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  C. Chothia,et al.  Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins , 1974, Nature.

[5]  W E Stites,et al.  Contributions of the large hydrophobic amino acids to the stability of staphylococcal nuclease. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[6]  N. Sakabe X-ray diffraction data collection system for modern protein crystallography with a Weissenberg camera and an imaging plate using synchrotron radiation , 1991 .

[7]  Peter D. Kwong,et al.  Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by cadherins , 1995, Nature.

[8]  D. Tronrud Conjugate-direction minimization: an improved method for the refinement of macromolecules. , 1992, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[9]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[10]  Dean R. Madden,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of HLA-B27 at 2.1 Å resolution suggests a general mechanism for tight peptide binding to MHC , 1992, Cell.

[11]  Replacement of P1 Leu18 by Glu18 in the reactive site of turkey ovomucoid third domain converts it into a strong inhibitor of Glu-specific Streptomyces griseus proteinase (GluSGP). , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  R. Read Improved Fourier Coefficients for Maps Using Phases from Partial Structures with Errors , 1986 .

[13]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  1.9 Å resolution refined structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of TATAAAAG , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  T. Bigler,et al.  Binding of amino acid side chains to preformed cavities: Interaction of serine proteinases with turkey ovomucoid third domains with coded and noncoded P1 residues , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  K. Dill,et al.  Partitioning of nonpolar solutes into bilayers and amorphous n-alkanes , 1990 .

[16]  B Honig,et al.  Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[17]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[18]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.

[19]  I. Kato,et al.  Protein inhibitors of proteinases. , 1980, Annual review of biochemistry.

[20]  R. Huber,et al.  X‐ray crystal structure of the complex of human leukocyte elastase (PMN elastase) and the third domain of the turkey ovomucoid inhibitor. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[21]  Jones Ta,et al.  Diffraction methods for biological macromolecules. Interactive computer graphics: FRODO. , 1985, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  R. Huber,et al.  Natural protein proteinase inhibitors and their interaction with proteinases. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  A. Fersht,et al.  Energetics of complementary side-chain packing in a protein hydrophobic core. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[24]  G N Murshudov,et al.  The structural basis of sequence-independent peptide binding by OppA protein. , 1994, Science.

[25]  R. Aveyard,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of aliphatic hydrocarbon/water interfaces , 1965 .

[26]  R. Huber,et al.  The crystal and molecular structure of the third domain of silver pheasant ovomucoid (OMSVP3). , 1985, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[28]  S. Park,et al.  Covalent hybrids of ovomucoid third domains made from one synthetic and one natural peptide chain. , 1987, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[29]  R J Read,et al.  Structure of the complex of Streptomyces griseus protease B and the third domain of the turkey ovomucoid inhibitor at 1.8-A resolution. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[30]  R. Huber,et al.  Refined X-ray crystal structures of the reactive site modified ovomucoid inhibitor third domains from silver pheasant (OMSVP3*) and from Japanese quail (OMJPQ3*). , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  L. Smillie,et al.  An improved fractionation system for pronase on CM-sephadex. , 1971, Canadian journal of biochemistry.

[32]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Determinants of repressor/operator recognition from the structure of the trp operator binding site , 1994, Nature.

[33]  L. Delbaere,et al.  The 4.5 Å Resolution Structure of a Bacterial Serine Protease from Streptomyces Griseus , 1974 .

[34]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Theory of macromolecule-ligand interactions , 1994 .

[35]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystallization, crystal structure analysis and molecular model of the third domain of Japanese quail ovomucoid, a Kazal type inhibitor. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of unmodified tRNA(Gln) complexed with glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and ATP suggests a possible role for pseudo-uridines in stabilization of RNA structure. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[37]  F. A. Quiocho,et al.  Substrate specificity and affinity of a protein modulated by bound water molecules , 1989, Nature.

[38]  B. Matthews,et al.  Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. , 1992, Science.

[39]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Crystal and molecular structures of the complex of α-chymotrypsin with its inhibitor Turkey ovomucoid third domain at 1.8 Å resolution , 1987 .

[40]  T. Higashi The processing of diffraction data taken on a screenless Weissenberg camera for macromolecular crystallography , 1989 .

[41]  A. Fersht,et al.  Principles of protein stability derived from protein engineering experiments , 1993 .

[42]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of Japanese quail ovomucoid, a Kazal-type inhibitor, and model building studies of complexes with serine proteases. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  B. Matthews Structural and genetic analysis of protein folding and stability: Current Opinion in Sturctural Biology 1993, 3:589–593 , 1993 .