Formation-flying interferometry
暂无分享,去创建一个
There are many advantages to space-based interferometry, but monolithic, single-spacecraft platforms set limits on the collecting area and baseline length. These constraints can be overcome by distributing the optical elements of the interferometer over a system of multiple spacecraft flying in precise formation, opening up new realms of angular resolution and sensitivity. While the principles of interferometry are the same as for structurally-connected systems, formation-flying interferometers must integrate a wide range of technologies to provide an optically stable platform capable of finding, tracking and measuring fringes. This paper discusses some of the key differences between formation-flying and structurally-connected interferometers, including formation configurations, controlling beam shear, station-keeping, and the importance of delay and delay rate estimation in determining the instrument sensitivity. Proposed future formation-flying interferometer missions include the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF), Darwin, the Submillimeter Probe of the Evolution of Cosmic Structure (SPECS), the Stellar Imager, the Micro-Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission (MAXIM), and its precursor, MAXIM Pathfinder. In addition, Life Finder and Planet Imager have been identified as two formation-flying missions capable of detailed characterization of habitable exo-planets. The parameters for these missions are compared and described briefly.
[1] Oliver P. Lay,et al. StarLight interferometer architecture and operational concepts , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.
[2] Robert A. Laskin,et al. Separated-spacecraft interferometer concept for the New Millennium Program , 1996, Optics & Photonics.
[3] David W. Miller,et al. Electromagnetic formation flight for sparse aperture telescopes , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[4] Marr-IVa. Space Interferometry Mission ( SIM ) : Overview and Current Status , 2003 .