Prompted by serious economic difficulties, in 1989 the Jordanian government launched a series of political liberalization measures aimed at rejuvenating the country's parliament and party politics, and restoring freedom to the media. Despite much initial enthusiasm, the liberalization process has become frozen and there have been few substantive moves toward a meaningful transition to democracy. Two developments have combined to result in this democratization freeze. One is the reluctance of the state to give up many of its powers in relation to the forces of civil society. A second is the inability of professional associations and the emerging parliamentary opposition bloc to formulate and institute viable links within themselves and with other social actors in an attempt to pressure the monarchy for more political concessions. The hybrid, semi‐democratic, absolutist monarchy that has emerged in the process has enhanced its popular legitimacy by adopting certain democratic trappings, which, in the short ...
[1]
G. Robinson.
Can islamists be democrats? the case of Jordan: 1729
,
1997
.
[2]
R. Appleby,et al.
Civil society : theory, history, comparison
,
1997
.
[3]
Beverley Milton-Edwards.
Climate of Change in Jordan’s Islamic Movement
,
1996
.
[4]
G. White,et al.
Civil society, democratization and development (I): Clearing the analytical ground
,
1994
.
[5]
H. Barakat,et al.
The Arab World: Society, Culture, and the State.
,
1994
.
[6]
M. Dunn.
ISLAMIST PARTIES IN DEMOCRATIZING STATES: A LOOK AT JORDAN AND YEMEN
,
1993
.
[7]
Rex Brynen.
Economic Crisis and Post-Rentier Democratization in the Arab World: The Case of Jordan
,
1992,
Canadian Journal of Political Science.
[8]
Lisa Anderson.
Absolutism and the Resilience of Monarchy in the Middle East
,
1991
.
[9]
R. Dahl,et al.
Democracy and Its Critics
,
1990
.