Sylys® surgical sealant: a safe adjunct to standard bowel anastomosis closure

BackgroundReducing the incidence of anastomotic leakages would benefit both patients and health care in general. Attempts to solve this problem have been disappointing thus far. Sylys® Surgical Sealant was developed as an extraluminal adjunct to standard closure techniques for bowel anastomosis procedures. We describe the results of a first-in-man study in which Sylys® Surgical Sealant is used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of Sylys® Surgical Sealant in stoma reversal procedures.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, first-in-man industry initiated study was performed in two independent hospitals in the Netherlands. The study population consisted of adults who were scheduled for an open ileostomy reversal procedure. Exclusion critera were: patients with severe co-morbidities, patients receiving antibiotics, immunosuppressive agents or steroids for pre-existing conditions. Follow up was conducted during 3 months after surgery at the outpatient clinic.ResultsSixteen patients were eligible for inclusion. Twenty adverse events were recorded in 12 of the 16 treated patients (75%). None of these events were considered to be related to Sylys® Surgical Sealant. No clinical signs of anastomotic leakage were reported.ConclusionsIn conclusion, this first-in-man application of Sylys® Surgical Sealant as an adjunct to standard bowel anastomosis closure techniques did not show any adverse effects in relation to the sealant in 16 patients.

[1]  R. Heald,et al.  Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  J. Saric,et al.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  A. Parvaiz,et al.  Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection , 2003, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  T. Koperna Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[5]  P. Wille-Jørgensen,et al.  Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  O. Dent,et al.  Anastomotic Leakage Is Predictive of Diminished Survival After Potentially Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[7]  B. Person,et al.  Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  N. Hyman,et al.  Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal Anastomosis: It's Later Than You Think , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[9]  M. Gagner,et al.  An update of available innovative staple line reinforcement materials in colorectal surgery. , 2008, Surgical technology international.

[10]  W. Gaertner,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a bovine pericardium-derived collagen matrix buttress in ileocolic and colon anastomoses. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  D. Hahnloser,et al.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies , 2010, Patient safety in surgery.

[12]  M. Franklin,et al.  Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement for circular stapler in colorectal surgery: a multicenter study. , 2010, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[13]  K. Havenga,et al.  Protection of stapled colorectal anastomoses with a biodegradable device: the C-Seal feasibility study. , 2011, American journal of surgery.

[14]  H. Pommergaard,et al.  External coating of colonic anastomoses: a systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[15]  J. Lange,et al.  Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment. , 2013, World journal of gastroenterology.