Elucidating multi-physics interactions in suspensions for the design of polymeric dispersants: a hierarchical machine learning approach

A computational method for understanding and optimizing the properties of complex physical systems is presented using polymeric dispersants as an example. Concentrated suspensions are formulated with dispersants to tune rheological parameters, such as yield stress or viscosity, but their competing effects on solution and particle variables have made it impossible to design them based on our knowledge of the interplay of chemistry and function. Here, physical and statistical modeling are integrated into a hierarchical framework of machine learning that provides insight into sparse experimental datasets. A library of 10 polymers having similar molecular weight but incorporating different functional groups commonly found in aqueous dispersants was used as a training set in magnesium oxide slurries. The compositions of these polymers were the experimental variables that determined the complex system responses, but the method leverages knowledge of the constituent “single-physics” interactions that underlie the suspension properties. Integration of domain knowledge is shown to allow robust predictions based on orders of magnitude fewer samples in the training set compared with purely statistical methods that directly correlate dispersant chemistry with changes in rheological properties. Minimization of the resulting function for slurry yield stress resulted in the prediction of a novel dispersant that was synthesized and shown to impart similar reductions as a leading commercial dispersant but with a significantly different composition and molecular architecture.

[1]  G. J. Fleer,et al.  Statistical Theory of the Adsorption of Interacting Chain Molecules. 1. Partition Function, Segment Density Distribution, and Adsorption Isotherms , 1979 .

[2]  B. Robinson,et al.  Characterisation of water-containing reversed micelles by viscosity and dynamic light scattering methods , 1979 .

[3]  A. Gast,et al.  Effect of polymer solutions on sterically stabilized suspensions , 1985 .

[4]  A. B. Metzner Rheology of Suspensions in Polymeric Liquids , 1985 .

[5]  I. Krieger,et al.  Rheological studies on sterically stabilized model dispersions of uniform colloidal spheres: II. Steady-shear viscosity , 1986 .

[6]  N. Tschoegl The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior , 1989 .

[7]  Leslie J. Struble,et al.  Viscosity of Portland cement paste as a function of concentration , 1995 .

[8]  J. Clayton Pigment/dispersant interactions in water-based coatings , 1997 .

[9]  R. Jerome,et al.  Design of polymeric dispersants for waterborne coatings , 1998 .

[10]  M. R. Osborne,et al.  On the LASSO and its Dual , 2000 .

[11]  S. Hanehara,et al.  Effects of the chemical structure on the properties of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer , 2000 .

[12]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties , 2001 .

[13]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[14]  J. Lewis Colloidal Processing of Ceramics , 2004 .

[15]  Glen H. Kirby,et al.  Comb Polymer Architecture Effects on the Rheological Property Evolution of Concentrated Cement Suspensions , 2004 .

[16]  K. Uematsu,et al.  Adsorption Effects on the Rheological Properties of Aqueous Alumina Suspensions with Polyelectrolyte , 2005 .

[17]  C. Plummer,et al.  Water-Soluble, Unimolecular Containers Based on Amphiphilic Multiarm Star Block Copolymers , 2006 .

[18]  H. Zou The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[19]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Design and Function of Novel Superplasticizers for More Durable High Performance Concrete (Superplast Project) , 2008 .

[20]  Benedikt M. Pötscher,et al.  On the Distribution of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimators: The LASSO, SCAD, and Thresholding , 2007, J. Multivar. Anal..

[21]  E. Lesniewska,et al.  Conformation of adsorbed comb copolymer dispersants. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  G. Casella,et al.  Penalized regression, standard errors, and Bayesian lassos , 2010 .

[23]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Accelerated computational discovery of high-performance materials for organic photovoltaics by means of cheminformatics , 2011 .

[24]  N. Wagner,et al.  Colloidal Suspension Rheology: Frontmatter , 2011 .

[25]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Molecular design of comb-shaped polycarboxylate dispersants for environmentally friendly concrete , 2013 .

[26]  Marco Buongiorno Nardelli,et al.  The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. , 2013, Nature materials.

[27]  Ashley A. White Big data are shaping the future of materials science , 2013 .

[28]  Sanguthevar Rajasekaran,et al.  Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[29]  H. Edlund,et al.  Lignin: Recent advances and emerging applications , 2014 .

[30]  Jamming rheology of model cementitious suspensions composed of comb‐polymer stabilized magnesium oxide particles , 2014 .

[31]  Alok Choudhary,et al.  Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning , 2014 .

[32]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Materials Data Science: Current Status and Future Outlook , 2015 .

[33]  Elizabeth A. Holm,et al.  A computer vision approach for automated analysis and classification of microstructural image data , 2015 .

[34]  Michael Rubinstein,et al.  Opportunities in theoretical and computational polymeric materials and soft matter. , 2015, Soft matter.

[35]  Chetali Gupta,et al.  Lignopolymers as viscosity-reducing additives in magnesium oxide suspensions. , 2015, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[36]  Krishna Rajan,et al.  Materials Informatics: The Materials ``Gene'' and Big Data , 2015 .

[37]  A. Choudhary,et al.  Perspective: Materials informatics and big data: Realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science , 2016 .

[38]  James M. Rondinelli,et al.  Theory-Guided Machine Learning in Materials Science , 2016, Front. Mater..

[39]  R. Needs,et al.  Perspective: Role of structure prediction in materials discovery and design , 2016 .

[40]  Andrew L. Ferguson,et al.  Nonlinear machine learning and design of reconfigurable digital colloids. , 2016, Soft matter.

[41]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Optimal experimental design for materials discovery , 2017 .

[42]  Chetali Gupta,et al.  Poly(ethylene oxide)-grafted lignosulfonate superplasticisers: improving performance by increasing steric interactions , 2017 .