Coronary arterial calcification on low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening: concordance study with dedicated cardiac CT.

OBJECTIVE Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is frequently detected on low-dose ungated MDCT performed for lung cancer screening. We aimed to determine the concordance of CAC scores on low-dose ungated and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The subjects were 513 patients consecutively registered for health screening and undergoing both low-dose ungated (120 kVp, 20 mAs) and regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT (120 kVp, 150 mAs, retrospective ECG gating). The first 30 cases were used for protocol optimization and a training session. Agatston score on regular-dose ECG-gated and low-dose ungated MDCT in the other 483 cases (320 men; mean age, 62.2 +/- 13.2 [SD] years) was calculated by two observers in a blinded manner. Interobserver and intertechnique scoring variability and concordance were calculated. RESULTS The mean of interobserver scoring variability for regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT was 3.6% and for low-dose ungated MDCT was 9.6%. Regular-dose ECG-gated MDCT depicted CAC in 221 (46%) of the subjects. With low-dose ungated MDCT, observers 1 and 2, respectively, had five and seven false-positive and five and four false-negative predictions. All the miscategorized scores were 12 or less. The negative predictive values of CAC on low-dose ungated MDCT were 98% and 99% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. For patients with CAC, the mean intertechnique scoring variability was 40-43%. For all 483 subjects, the intertechnique concordance of the four major score ranks (0, 1-100, 101-400, > 400) was high (kappa = 0.89 for the two observers). CONCLUSION Low-dose ungated MDCT with an optimized protocol is reliable for prediction of the presence of CAC and categorization of the four major Agatston score ranks. This technique may be useful for coronary artery disease risk stratification of persons undergoing low-dose ungated MDCT for lung cancer screening.

[1]  David F Yankelevitz,et al.  Frequency of coronary artery calcification on low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. , 2006, Clinical imaging.

[2]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  K. Hopper,et al.  Comparison of electron-beam and ungated helical CT in detecting coronary arterial calcification by using a working heart phantom and artificial coronary arteries. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  N. Kohno,et al.  Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  Richard D. White,et al.  Potential clinical impact of variability in the measurement of coronary artery calcification with sequential MDCT. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Absence of coronary calcification on double-helical CT scans: predictor of angiographically normal coronary arteries in elderly women? , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Usefulness of spiral computed tomography (dual-slice mode) for the detection of coronary artery calcium in patients with chronic atypical chest pain, in typical angina pectoris, and in asymptomatic subjects with prominent atherosclerotic risk factors. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Y. Akiyama,et al.  Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Survival of Patients with Stage I Lung Cancer Detected on CT Screening , 2008 .

[12]  A. Tenenbaum,et al.  Comparison of coronary calcium in stable angina pectoris and in first acute myocardial infarction utilizing double helical computerized tomography. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  J Simon,et al.  Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  S. Sone,et al.  Coronary artery calcification detected by a mobile helical computed tomography unit and future cardiovascular death: 4-year follow-up of 6120 asymptomatic Japanese , 2004, Heart and Vessels.

[16]  Willi A Kalender,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT. , 2007, Radiology.

[17]  Y. Akiyama,et al.  Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Bernd Ohnesorge,et al.  Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT. , 2002, Radiology.

[19]  C. Becker,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT , 2002, European Radiology.

[20]  Y. Akiyama,et al.  Electron beam CT versus 16-MDCT on the variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements in a variable heart rate phantom. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Mark A. Hlatky,et al.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2007 .