Assessing CLIL: a multidisciplinary approach

ABSTRACT Introduction of the Special Issue ‘Assessing CLIL: A multidisciplinary approach’.

[1]  F. Meunier,et al.  Effects of input on L2 writing in English and Dutch , 2020, Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education.

[2]  B. Galand,et al.  CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium , 2020, Language, Culture and Curriculum.

[3]  J. Goris,et al.  Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies , 2019, European Educational Research Journal.

[4]  D. Lasagabaster,et al.  The impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal study , 2019 .

[5]  A. Szmalec,et al.  Executive control performance and foreign-language proficiency associated with immersion education in French-speaking Belgium , 2019, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[6]  Isa Hendrikx.  The acquisition of intensifying constructions in Dutch and English by French-speaking CLIL and non-CLIL students , 2019 .

[7]  J. McQueen,et al.  Language balance and switching ability in children acquiring English as a second language. , 2018, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  L. V. Mensel,et al.  Classroom Anxiety and Enjoyment in CLIL and Non-CLIL: Does the Target Language Matter?. , 2018 .

[9]  M. Cañado.  From the CLIL craze to the CLIL conundrum: Addressing the current CLIL controversy , 2016 .

[10]  Christiane Fiege,et al.  The effect of content and language integrated learning on students' English and history competences – Killing two birds with one stone? , 2016 .

[11]  F. Genesee,et al.  Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward , 2014 .

[12]  Aintzane Doiz,et al.  CLIL and motivation: the effect of individual and contextual variables , 2014 .

[13]  L. Ortega.  SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary Progress, Transdisciplinary Relevance, and the Bi/multilingual Turn , 2013 .

[14]  M. Poncelet,et al.  Cognitive advantage in children enrolled in a second-language immersion elementary school program for three years* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[15]  María Luisa Pérez-Cañado.  CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future , 2012 .

[16]  Roy Lyster,et al.  Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts , 2011 .

[17]  Christiane Dalton-Puffer,et al.  Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? , 2011, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[18]  Christiane Dalton-Puffer,et al.  Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms , 2010 .

[19]  D. Coyle.  Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies , 2007 .

[20]  F. Meunier,et al.  Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in the French-speaking Community of Belgium: linguistic, cognitive and educational perspectives , 2017 .

[21]  A. Szmalec,et al.  Assessing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in French-speaking Belgium: Linguistic, cognitive and educational perspectives , 2017 .

[22]  Fanny Meunier,et al.  Using global complexity measures to assess second language proficiency: Comparing CLIL and non-CLIL learners of English and Dutch in French-speaking Belgium , 2017 .

[23]  Amy S. Thompson,et al.  Language learning motivation and CLIL: is there a connection? , 2015 .