Rates and patterns of surface deformation from laser scanning following the South Napa earthquake, California

The A.D. 2014 M6.0 South Napa earthquake, despite its moderate magnitude, caused significant damage to the Napa Valley in northern California (USA). Surface rupture occurred along several mapped and unmapped faults. Field observations following the earthquake indicated that the magnitude of postseismic surface slip was likely to approach or exceed the maximum coseismic surface slip and as such presented ongoing hazard to infrastructure. Using a laser scanner, we monitored postseismic deformation in three dimensions through time along 0.5 km of the main surface rupture. A key component of this study is the demonstration of proper alignment of repeat surveys using point cloud–based methods that minimize error imposed by both local survey errors and global navigation satellite system georeferencing errors. Using solid modeling of natural and cultural features, we quantify dextral postseismic displacement at several hundred points near the main fault trace. We also quantify total dextral displacement of initially straight cultural features. Total dextral displacement from both coseismic displacement and the first 2.5 d of postseismic displacement ranges from 0.22 to 0.29 m. This range increased to 0.33–0.42 m at 59 d post-earthquake. Furthermore, we estimate up to 0.15 m of vertical deformation during the first 2.5 d post-earthquake, which then increased by ∼0.02 m at 59 d post-earthquake. This vertical deformation is not expressed as a distinct step or scarp at the fault trace but rather as a broad up-to-the-west zone of increasing elevation change spanning the fault trace over several tens of meters, challenging common notions about fault scarp development in strike-slip systems. Integrating these analyses provides three-dimensional mapping of surface deformation and identifies spatial variability in slip along the main fault trace that we attribute to distributed slip via subtle block rotation. These results indicate the benefits of laser scanner surveys along active faults and demonstrate that fine-scale variability in fault slip has been missed by traditional earthquake response methods.

[1]  Michael Oskin,et al.  Surface‐Rupture and Slip Observations on the Day of the 24 August 2014 South Napa Earthquake , 2015 .

[2]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The 2014 Mw 6.1 South Napa Earthquake: A Unilateral Rupture with Shallow Asperity and Rapid Afterslip , 2015 .

[3]  S. DeLong,et al.  Surface slip associated with the 2014 South Napa, California earthquake measured on alinement arrays , 2014 .

[4]  S. Hough.  Where was the 1898 Mare Island Earthquake? Insights from the 2014 South Napa Earthquake , 2014 .

[5]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Coseismic fault zone deformation revealed with differential lidar: Examples from Japanese Mw ∼7 intraplate earthquakes , 2014 .

[6]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion , 2014 .

[7]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The Time‐Independent Model , 2014 .

[8]  Alejandro Hinojosa-Corona,et al.  Optimization of legacy lidar data sets for measuring near‐field earthquake displacements , 2014 .

[9]  J. Dolan,et al.  How well do surface slip measurements track slip at depth in large strike-slip earthquakes? The importance of fault structural maturity in controlling on-fault slip versus off-fault surface deformation , 2014 .

[10]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Mobile Laser Scanning Applied to the Earth Sciences , 2013 .

[11]  Thomas K. Rockwell,et al.  Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the 1940 Imperial Valley Earthquake, Imperial Fault, Southern California: Implications for Rupture Segmentation and Dynamics , 2013 .

[12]  O. Kreylos,et al.  Coseismic slip variation assessed from terrestrial lidar scans of the El Mayor–Cucapah surface rupture , 2013 .

[13]  Sebastien Leprince,et al.  Fault kinematics and surface deformation across a releasing bend during the 2010 MW 7.1 Darfield, New Zealand, earthquake revealed by differential LiDAR and cadastral surveying , 2013 .

[14]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Three‐dimensional surface displacements and rotations from differencing pre‐ and post‐earthquake LiDAR point clouds , 2012 .

[15]  Adrian A. Borsa,et al.  Rapid Determination of Near‐Fault Earthquake Deformation Using Differential LiDAR , 2012 .

[16]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Probabilistic Estimates of Surface Coseismic Slip and Afterslip for Hayward Fault Earthquakes , 2012 .

[17]  O. Kreylos,et al.  A terrestrial lidar-based workflow for determining three-dimensional slip vectors and associated uncertainties , 2012 .

[18]  James Hollingsworth,et al.  Constraints on fault and lithosphere rheology from the coseismic slip and postseismic afterslip of the 2006 Mw7.0 Mozambique earthquake , 2012 .

[19]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Near-Field Deformation from the El Mayor–Cucapah Earthquake Revealed by Differential LIDAR , 2012, Science.

[20]  J. Boatwright,et al.  Long‐Term Creep Rates on the Hayward Fault: Evidence for Controls on the Size and Frequency of Large Earthquakes , 2012 .

[21]  D. Wagner,et al.  Geophysical framework of the northern San Francisco Bay region, California , 2010 .

[22]  Giancanio Sileo,et al.  Partitioned postseismic deformation associated with the 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila earthquake surface rupture measured using a terrestrial laser scanner , 2010 .

[23]  George E. Hilley,et al.  Morphologic dating of fault scarps using airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM) data , 2010 .

[24]  B. Baker,et al.  Surface Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Measured on Alinement Arrays , 2006 .

[25]  R. Jachens,et al.  Geophysical Setting of the 2000 ML 5.2 Yountville, California, Earthquake: Implications for Seismic Hazard in Napa Valley, California , 2006 .

[26]  Robert E. Kayen,et al.  Terrestrial-LIDAR Visualization of Surface and Structural Deformations of the 2004 Niigata Ken Chuetsu, Japan, Earthquake , 2006 .

[27]  Robert Langridge,et al.  Lateral Offsets on Surveyed Cultural Features Resulting from the 1999 İzmit and Düzce Earthquakes, Turkey , 2002 .

[28]  P. Segall,et al.  Slip in the 1868 Hayward earthquake from the analysis of historical triangulation data , 1996 .

[29]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  M. Lisowski,et al.  Historic creep rate and potential for seismic slip along the Hayward Fault, California , 1991 .

[31]  K. Hudnut,et al.  Surface ruptures on cross-faults in the 24 November 1987 Superstition Hills, California, earthquake sequence , 1989 .

[32]  Robert V. Sharp,et al.  Surface faulting along the Superstition Hills fault zone and nearby faults associated with the earthquakes of 24 November 1987 , 1989 .

[33]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  Key recovery factors for the August 24, 2014, South Napa Earthquake , 2014 .

[34]  Pilar Villamor,et al.  Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: Implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis , 2012 .

[35]  E. Brabb,et al.  Geologic Map and Map Database of Eastern Sonoma and Western Napa Counties, California , 2007 .

[36]  J. Suppe,et al.  Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding , 1990 .

[37]  Kenneth F. Fox.  Tectonic setting of late Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene rocks in part of the Coast Ranges north of San Francisco, California , 1983 .

[38]  D. Herd,et al.  Map showing faults with Quaternary displacement, northeastern San Francisco Bay region, California , 1977 .

[39]  J. Sims,et al.  Preliminary geologic map of eastern Sonoma County and western Napa County, California , 1973 .

[40]  R. B. Curry,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Tables S1 to S3 References Appendices S1 and S2 Frictional Afterslip following the 2005 Nias-simeulue Earthquake, Sumatra , 2022 .