Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication

Machine learning techniques relevant for nonlinearity mitigation, carrier recovery, and nanoscale device characterization are reviewed and employed. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in combination with Bayesian filtering is employed within the nonlinear state-space framework and demonstrated for parameter estimation. It is shown that the time-varying effects of cross-phase modulation (XPM) induced polarization scattering and phase noise can be formulated within the nonlinear state-space model (SSM). This allows for tracking and compensation of the XPM induced impairments by employing approximate stochastic filtering methods such as extended Kalman or particle filtering. The achievable gains are dependent on the autocorrelation (AC) function properties of the impairments under consideration which is strongly dependent on the transmissions scenario. The gain of the compensation method are therefore investigated by varying the parameters of the AC function describing XPM-induced polarization scattering and phase noise. It is shown that an increase in the nonlinear tolerance of more than 2 dB is achievable for 32 Gbaud QPSK and 16-quadratic-amplitude modulation (QAM). It is also reviewed how laser rate equations can be formulated within the nonlinear state-space framework which allows for tracking of nonLorentzian laser phase noise lineshapes. It is experimentally demonstrated for 28 Gbaud 16-QAM signals that if the laser phase noise shape strongly deviates from the Lorentzian, phase noise tracking algorithms employing rate equation-based SSM result in a significant performance improvement (>8 dB) compared to traditional approaches using digital phase-locked loop. Finally, Gaussian mixture model is reviewed and employed for nonlinear phase noise compensation and characterization of nanoscale devices structure variations.

[1]  H. Bulow Experimental Demonstration of Optical Signal Detection Using Nonlinear Fourier Transform , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  Zhan Su,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of silicon photonic devices with correlated and non-Gaussian random parameters. , 2015, Optics express.

[3]  James C. Spall,et al.  Estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[4]  Jean-Christophe Antona,et al.  Generalized Maximum Likelihood for Cross-Polarization Modulation Effects Compensation , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[5]  Frank R. Kschischang,et al.  Information Transmission Using the Nonlinear Fourier Transform, Part III: Spectrum Modulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Luca Barletta,et al.  Compensation of XPM interference by blind tracking of the nonlinear phase in WDM systems with QAM input , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[7]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Nonlinear impairment compensation using expectation maximization for dispersion managed and unmanaged PDM 16-QAM transmission. , 2012, Optics express.

[8]  Thomas Richter,et al.  Generation and Coherent Reception of 107-GBd Optical Nyquist BPSK, QPSK, and 16QAM , 2014, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[9]  Maurice O'Sullivan,et al.  Advances in High-Speed DACs, ADCs, and DSP for Optical Coherent Transceivers , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Some Classical and Some New Ideas for Identification of Linear Systems , 2013 .

[11]  Zhenning Tao,et al.  Simple Fiber Model for Determination of XPM Effects , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Laser Rate Equation-Based Filtering for Carrier Recovery in Characterization and Communication , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[13]  Henk Wymeersch,et al.  Stochastic Digital Backpropagation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Ronen Dar,et al.  Inter-Channel Nonlinear Interference Noise in WDM Systems: Modeling and Mitigation , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  A. Adamiecki,et al.  High symbol rate transmission systems for data rates above 400 Gb/s using ETDM transmitters and receivers , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[16]  Simo Särkkä,et al.  Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing , 2013, Institute of Mathematical Statistics textbooks.

[17]  Jianjun Yu,et al.  High Speed All Optical Nyquist Signal Generation and Full-band Coherent Detection , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Jaroslaw E Prilepsky,et al.  Nonlinear inverse synthesis and eigenvalue division multiplexing in optical fiber channels. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[19]  Takeshi Hoshida,et al.  Nonlinear polarization crosstalk canceller for dual-polarization digital coherent receivers , 2010, 2010 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication (OFC/NFOEC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[20]  Giuseppe Durisi,et al.  Capacity of a Nonlinear Optical Channel With Finite Memory , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[21]  D. Zibar,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques in Optical Communication , 2016 .

[22]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Amplitude and Phase Noise Characterization , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[23]  Xiaodan Pang,et al.  Rate equation-based phase recovery for semiconductor laser coherent transmitters , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[24]  Gabriel Charlet,et al.  1-Terabit/s net data-rate transceiver based on single-carrier Nyquist-shaped 124 GBaud PDM-32QAM , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[25]  Henk Wymeersch,et al.  On the use of factor graphs in optical communications , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[26]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.