Critical-like behaviour of glass-forming liquids.

Recently it has been revealed that when approaching the glass-transition temperature, T(g), the dynamics of a liquid not only drastically slows down, but also becomes progressively more heterogeneous. From our simulations and experiments of six different glass-forming liquids, we find that the heterogeneous dynamics is a result of critical-like fluctuations of static structural order, contrary to a common belief that it is purely of dynamic origin. The static correlation length and susceptibility of a structural order parameter show Ising-like power-law divergence towards the ideal glass-transition point. However, this structural ordering accompanies little density change, which explains why it has not been detected by the static structure factor so far. Our results suggest a far more direct link than thought before between glass transition and critical phenomena. Indeed, the glass transition may be a new type of critical phenomenon where a structural order parameter is directly linked to slowness.

[1]  Chandra,et al.  Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[2]  T. Lubensky,et al.  Principles of condensed matter physics , 1995 .

[3]  J. Dyre.  The glass transition and elastic models of glass-forming liquids , 2006 .

[4]  S. Glotzer,et al.  Spatially heterogeneous dynamics investigated via a time-dependent four-point density correlation function , 2003 .

[5]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[6]  W. Kegel,et al.  Direct observation of dynamical heterogeneities in colloidal hard-sphere suspensions , 2000, Science.

[7]  J. P. Garrahan,et al.  Coarse-grained microscopic model of glass formers , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Predicting the long-time dynamic heterogeneity in a supercooled liquid on the basis of short-time heterogeneities. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[9]  D. Weitz,et al.  Weak correlations between local density and dynamics near the glass transition. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  M D Ediger,et al.  Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids. , 2003, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[11]  L. Berthier,et al.  Direct Experimental Evidence of a Growing Length Scale Accompanying the Glass Transition , 2005, Science.

[12]  Huang,et al.  Scaling theory for the glass transition. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[13]  Hajime Tanaka,et al.  Frustration on the way to crystallization in glass , 2006 .

[14]  R. Yamamoto,et al.  Kinetic Heterogeneities in a Highly Supercooled Liquid , 1997, cond-mat/9807218.

[15]  Hajime Tanaka.  Two-order-parameter model of the liquid–glass transition. II. Structural relaxation and dynamic heterogeneity , 2005 .

[16]  Steven J. Plimpton,et al.  DYNAMICAL HETEROGENEITIES IN A SUPERCOOLED LENNARD-JONES LIQUID , 1997 .

[17]  K. Binder,et al.  Finite-Size Effect in the Dynamics Near the Glass Transition , 1994 .

[18]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Quantitative link between single-particle dynamics and static structure of supercooled liquids. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  G. Biroli,et al.  Thermodynamic signature of growing amorphous order in glass-forming liquids , 2008, 0805.4427.

[20]  G. Maret,et al.  Local crystalline order in a 2D colloidal glass former , 2008, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[21]  Hajime Tanaka,et al.  Direct observation of medium-range crystalline order in granular liquids near the glass transition. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[22]  G. McKenna.  Glass dynamics: Diverging views on glass transition , 2008 .

[23]  Peter Harrowell,et al.  How reproducible are dynamic heterogeneities in a supercooled liquid? , 2004, Physical review letters.

[24]  A. Onuki.  Phase Transition Dynamics: Statics , 2002 .

[25]  C. Angell,et al.  Formation of Glasses from Liquids and Biopolymers , 1995, Science.

[26]  J. P. Garrahan,et al.  Dynamic Order-Disorder in Atomistic Models of Structural Glass Formers , 2009, Science.

[27]  Akira Onuki,et al.  Phase Transition Dynamics , 2000 .

[28]  David R. Reichman,et al.  Irreversible reorganization in a supercooled liquid originates from localized soft modes , 2008 .

[29]  Takeshi Kawasaki,et al.  Correlation between dynamic heterogeneity and medium-range order in two-dimensional glass-forming liquids. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[30]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses , 1983 .

[31]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Statistical physics of structural glasses , 2000 .

[32]  Daan Frenkel,et al.  Suppression of crystal nucleation in polydisperse colloids due to increase of the surface free energy , 2001, Nature.

[33]  J. P. Garrahan,et al.  Corresponding states of structural glass formers. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[34]  H. Sillescu.  Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a review , 1999 .

[35]  Z. Nussinov,et al.  TOPICAL REVIEW: The frustration-based approach of supercooled liquids and the glass transition: a review and critical assessment , 2005 .

[36]  Kurt Binder,et al.  Supercooled Liquids and the Glass Transition , 2011 .

[37]  Free volume cannot explain the spatial heterogeneity of Debye–Waller factors in a glass-forming binary alloy , 2005, cond-mat/0511690.

[38]  N. Clark,et al.  Melting and Liquid Structure in two Dimensions , 2007 .

[39]  Srikanth Sastry,et al.  Growing length and time scales in glass-forming liquids , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  P. Harrowell,et al.  Non‐Gaussian behavior and the dynamical complexity of particle motion in a dense two‐dimensional liquid , 1996 .

[41]  P. Harrowell,et al.  Stability and structure of a supercooled liquid mixture in two dimensions. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[42]  G. Biroli,et al.  Dynamical susceptibility of glass formers: contrasting the predictions of theoretical scenarios. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Jeppe C. Dyre,et al.  Colloquium : The glass transition and elastic models of glass-forming liquids , 2006 .

[44]  Paul F. McMillan,et al.  Relaxation in glassforming liquids and amorphous solids , 2000 .

[45]  Schofield,et al.  Three-dimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition , 2000, Science.

[46]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Is random close packing of spheres well defined? , 2000, Physical review letters.

[47]  Eran Bouchbinder,et al.  Direct identification of the glass transition: Growing length scale and the onset of plasticity , 2007 .

[48]  Ising transition driven by frustration in a 2D classical model with continuous symmetry. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[49]  T. R. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Scaling concepts for the dynamics of viscous liquids near an ideal glassy state. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[50]  A. Young,et al.  Spin glasses and random fields , 1997 .

[51]  Hajime Tanaka.  Two-order-parameter description of liquids. I. A general model of glass transition covering its strong to fragile limit , 1999 .

[52]  L. Berthier,et al.  Nonperturbative effect of attractive forces in viscous liquids. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[53]  P G Wolynes,et al.  Fragilities of liquids predicted from the random first order transition theory of glasses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  G. Adam,et al.  On the Temperature Dependence of Cooperative Relaxation Properties in Glass‐Forming Liquids , 1965 .

[55]  J. Dyre,et al.  Little evidence for dynamic divergences in ultraviscous molecular liquids , 2008 .

[56]  D. Fisher.  Activated dynamic scaling in disordered systems (invited) , 1987 .

[57]  M A Moore,et al.  Glass phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.