Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics Toolkit for Teachers

Introduction Learning Management Systems (LMS) or Virtual Learning Environments (VLE) are widely used and have become part of the common toolkits of educators (Schroeder, 2009). One of the main goals of the integration of traditional teaching methods with technology enhancements is the improvement of teaching and learning quality in large university courses with many students. But does utilizing a VLE automatically improve teaching and learning? In our experience, many teachers just upload existing files, like lecture slides, handouts and exercises, when starting to use a VLE. Thereby availability of learning resources is improved. For improving teaching and learning it could be helpful to create more motivating, challenging, and engaging learning materials and e.g., collaborative scenarios to improve learning among large groups of students. Teachers could e.g., use audio and video recordings of their lectures or provide interactive, demonstrative multimedia examples and quizzes. If they put effort in the design of such online learning activities, they need tools that help them observe the consequences of their actions and evaluate their teaching interventions. They need to have appropriate access to data to assess changing behaviors and performances of their students to estimate the level of improvement that has been achieved in the learning environment. With the establishment of TEL, a new research field, called Learning Analytics, is emerging (Elias, 2011). This research field borrows and synthesizes techniques from different related fields, such as Educational Data Mining (EDM), Academic Analytics, Social Network Analysis or Business Intelligence (BI), to harness them for converting educational data into useful information and thereon to motivate actions, like self-reflecting ones previous teaching or learning activities, to foster improved teaching and learning. The main goal of BI is to turn enterprise data into useful information for management decision support. However, Learning Analytics, Academic Analytics, as well as EDM more specifically focus on tools and methods for exploring data coming from educational contexts. While Academic Analytics take a university-wide perspective, including also e.g., organizational and financial issues (Campbell & Oblinger, 2007), Learning Analytics as well as EDM focus specifically on data about teaching and learning. Siemens (2010) defines Learning Analytics as "the use of intelligent data, learner-produced data, and analysis models to discover information and social connections, and to predict and advise on learning." It can support teachers and students to take action based on the evaluation of educational data. However, the technology to deliver this potential is still very young and research on understanding the pedagogical usefulness of Learning Analytics is still in its infancy (Johnson et al., 2011b; Johnson et al., 2012). It is a current goal at RWTH Aachen University to enhance its VLE--the learning and teaching portal L2P (Gebhardt et al., 2007)--with user-friendly tools for Learning Analytics, in order to equip their teachers and tutors with means to evaluate the effectiveness of TEL within their instructional design and courses offered. These teachers still face difficulties, deterring them from integrating cyclical reflective research activities, comparable to Action Research, into everyday practice. Action Research is characterized by a continuing effort to closely interlink, relate and confront action and reflection, to reflect upon one's conscious and unconscious doings in order to develop one's actions, and to act reflectively in order to develop one's knowledge." (Altrichter et al., 2005, p. 6). A pre-eminent barrier is the additional workload, originating from tasks of collecting, integrating, and analyzing raw data from log files of their VLE (Altenbernd-Giani et al., 2009). To tackle these issues, we have developed the "exploratory Learning Analytics Toolkit" (eLAT). …

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation , 1992, CHI.

[2]  Michael Eagle,et al.  The EDM Vis Tool , 2011, EDM.

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[5]  Vania Dimitrova,et al.  CourseVis: A graphical student monitoring tool for supporting instructors in web-based distance courses , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  Ulrik Schroeder Web-Based Learning - Yes We Can! , 2009, ICWL.

[8]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  A Java Desktop Tool for Mining Moodle Data , 2011, EDM.

[9]  Marta E. Zorrilla,et al.  E-learning Web Miner: A Data Mining Application to Help Instructors Involved in Virtual Courses , 2011, EDM.

[10]  Sébastien George,et al.  TrAVis to enhance online tutoring and learning activities: Real-time visualization of students tracking data , 2011, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[11]  John Fritz,et al.  Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[12]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  The pluralistic usability walkthrough: coordinated empathies , 1994 .

[13]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[15]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Forschungsfeld Learning Analytics , 2012, i-com.

[17]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Ansätze zur Entwicklung datenschutzkonformer E-Learning-Plattformen , 2009, DeLFI.

[18]  Mohamed Amine Chatti Personalization in technology enhanced learning: a social software perspective , 2010 .

[19]  Austin Gibbons,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[20]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[21]  Hubert Naacke,et al.  Proceedings of the 2009 EDBT/ICDT Workshops , 2009 .

[22]  Peter N. Posch,et al.  Teachers investigate their work : an introduction to the methods of action research , 1993 .

[23]  Dennis Zielke,et al.  eLAT: An Exploratory Learning Analytics Tool for Reflection and Iterative Improvement of Technology Enhanced Learning , 2011, EDM.

[24]  Marek Hatala,et al.  A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Christian Glahn,et al.  Contextual support of social engagement and reflection on the Web , 2009 .

[27]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The 2011 Horizon Report. , 2011 .

[28]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[29]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  CAMera for PLE , 2009, EC-TEL.

[30]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Effizientes und nachhaltiges eLearning an der RWTH Aachen durch das integrierte Lehr- und Lernportal L2P und das CAMPUS-Informationssystem , 2007 .

[31]  María José del Jesús,et al.  KEEL: a software tool to assess evolutionary algorithms for data mining problems , 2008, Soft Comput..

[32]  Sabine Graf,et al.  AAT: a tool for accessing and analysing students' behaviour data in learning systems , 2011, LAK.

[33]  Agathe Merceron,et al.  A Data Model to Ease Analysis and Mining of Educational Data , 2010, EDM.

[34]  Marta E. Zorrilla,et al.  A decision support system to improve e-learning environments , 2010, EDBT '10.

[35]  Riccardo Mazza,et al.  Monitoring an Online Course With the GISMO Tool: A Case Study , 2007 .

[36]  Tanya Elias,et al.  Learning Analytics: Definitions, Processes and Potential , 2011 .

[37]  Raquel Hijon,et al.  E-learning Platforms Analysis and Development of Students Tracking Functionality , 2006 .

[38]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm , 1992, RFC.

[39]  José L. Balcázar,et al.  Towards Parameter-free Data Mining: Mining Educational Data with Yacaree , 2011, EDM.

[40]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[41]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[42]  Riccardo Mazza,et al.  Evaluating information visualization applications with focus groups: the CourseVis experience , 2006, BELIV '06.

[43]  G. Naderer,et al.  Qualitative Marktforschung in Theorie und Praxis , 2007 .