Froth recovery of industrial flotation cells

Abstract The mass flowrate of particles (ton/h), entering the froth by true flotation, was evaluated from direct measurement of bubble load (ton/m 3 ) and gas flowrate (m 3 /h). This information, together with the concentrate mass flowrate, allowed the estimation of the froth recovery of floatable mineral in a 130 m 3 rougher flotation cell. It was found that mineral transport along the froth was mainly non-selective, and also the contribution of valuable minerals recovered by entrainment was negligible, if compared with minerals recovered by true flotation. Thus, a direct estimation of the froth recovery was obtained, without arbitrary assumptions about the grade of mineral transport by entrainment and drainage. This simple procedure allows a non-biased and independent evaluation of the effect that design and operating variables have upon the collection and froth zones performance, in large flotation cells. The use of this approach for flotation cells diagnosis and development of new control strategies is considered.

[1]  J. A. Finch,et al.  Froth Zone Recovery in a Flotation Column , 1990 .

[2]  Andrew L. Mular,et al.  Mineral Processing Plant Design , 1978 .

[3]  Mehmet Polat,et al.  First-order flotation kinetics models and methods for estimation of the true distribution of flotation rate constants , 2000 .

[4]  J-P. Franzidis,et al.  Bubble load measurement in the pulp zone of industrial flotation machines—a new device for determining the froth recovery of attached particles , 2004 .

[5]  J. Deventer,et al.  Transport phenomena at the pulp-froth interface in a flotation column: II. Detachment , 2004 .

[6]  P. M. Gallegos-Acevedo,et al.  Maximum bubble loads: Experimental measurement vs. analytical estimation , 2006 .

[7]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  Selective transport of attached particles across the pulp-froth interface , 2006 .

[8]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  The use of bubble loads to interpret transport phenomena at the pulp-froth interface in a flotation column , 2001 .

[9]  O. N. Savassi.  A compartment model for the mass transfer inside a conventional flotation cell , 2005 .

[10]  J. Franzidis,et al.  Simultaneous determination of collection zone rate constant and froth zone recovery in a mechanical flotation environment , 1999 .

[11]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Hydrodynamic and metallurgical characterization of industrial flotation banks for control purposes , 2001 .

[12]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  Froth recovery measurement in plant scale flotation cells , 2003 .

[13]  Z. T. Mathe,et al.  A review of methods to model the froth phase in non-steady state flotation systems , 2000 .

[14]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  Transport phenomena at the pulp-froth interface in a flotation column: I. Recovery profiles , 2004 .

[15]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Froth zone modelling of an industrial flotation column , 1998 .

[16]  H. Li,et al.  REVIEWING THE EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CARRYING CAPACITY IN FLOTATION COLUMNS , 2004 .

[17]  C. Harris.  Multiphase models of flotation machine behaviour , 1978 .

[18]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Development of a carrying-capacity model for column froth flotation , 2000 .

[19]  M. Falutsu,et al.  Direct measurement of froth drop back and collection zone recovery in a laboratory flotation column , 1989 .

[20]  B. K. Loveday,et al.  An improved model for simulation of flotation circuits , 2000 .

[21]  J. Finch,et al.  Selectivity in column flotation froths , 1988 .

[22]  Z. T. Mathe,et al.  Review of froth modelling in steady state flotation systems , 1998 .