UK-Based Police Officers' Perceptions of, and Role in Investigating, Cyber-Harassment as a Crime

Within the UK, cyber-harassment is a criminal act and perpetrators can be prosecuted if the crime is reported to the police. Cyber-harassment has a detrimental impact and causes psychological distress to victims but due to its online nature, complaints made may not be taken seriously and the impact may not be fully acknowledged. Police officers' perceptions of this crime and its victims are crucial as this will impact on how the crime is investigated and whether perpetrators are prosecuted. The present exploratory study aimed to gain insight into how cyber-harassment is investigated and identify issues and barriers. Eight police officers based in the United Kingdom were recruited using a snowball technique to participate in semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis and three themes were identified: online accessibility, threat, and the unhelpful victim. Each theme is discussed in relation to theory, policy and legislation within the UK.

[1]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Cyberstalking:a new challenge for criminal law , 2002 .

[2]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  T. Baker,et al.  Chapter 12. Cyberstalking , 2008 .

[4]  U. Kelle Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages , 2006 .

[5]  Lorraine Sheridan,et al.  Stalking and psychosexual obsession : psychological perspectives for prevention, policing and treatment , 2002 .

[6]  J. Finn A Survey of Online Harassment at a University Campus , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[7]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[8]  P. Emmelkamp,et al.  Informant Personality Descriptions of Postintimate Stalkers Using the Five Factor Profile , 2004, Journal of personality assessment.

[9]  D. Wall Catching Cybercriminals: Policing the Internet , 1998 .

[10]  Chris Bryden,et al.  I can see you: harassment and stalking on the Internet , 2009 .

[11]  Paul Bocij,et al.  Cyberstalking: a matter for community safety but the numbers do not add up , 2003 .

[12]  R. Spears,et al.  Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups , 2001 .

[13]  Ezer Osei Yeboah-Boateng,et al.  Digital Forensic Investigations: Issues of Intangibility, Complications and Inconsistencies in Cyber-crimes , 2016, J. Cyber Secur. Mobil..

[14]  A. Joinson Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[16]  H. Bernard,et al.  Techniques to Identify Themes , 2003 .

[17]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[18]  Harald Dreßing,et al.  Cyberstalking in a Large Sample of Social Network Users: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Impact Upon Victims , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and social identity , 2007 .

[20]  Frances L. Coleman,et al.  Stalking Behavior and the Cycle of Domestic Violence , 1997 .

[21]  S Fullbrook,et al.  The Protection From Harassment Act. , 1998, The British journal of theatre nursing : NATNews : the official journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.

[22]  Griffiths,et al.  Cyberstalking: a cause for police concern? , 1999 .

[23]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[24]  Laura Huey,et al.  “Just Being Mean to Somebody Isn’t a Police Matter”: Police Perspectives on Policing Cyberbullying , 2015 .

[25]  W. Fremouw,et al.  Stalking on campus: the prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[26]  Lorraine Sheridan,et al.  The Toll of Stalking , 2002 .

[27]  A. Hills,et al.  Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target‐stalker relationship , 1998 .

[28]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Truth, Lies and Trust on the Internet , 2008 .

[29]  Mandeep Kaur,et al.  A Literature review on Cyber Forensic and its Analysis tools , 2016 .

[30]  Griffiths,et al.  Crime and IT (part II): 'Stalking the Net' , 1998 .

[31]  M. Williams,et al.  Policing diversity in the digital age , 2007 .

[32]  L. Sheridan,et al.  Is cyberstalking different? , 2007 .

[33]  S. Dziegielewski,et al.  Assessment typology and intervention with the survivors of stalking , 1996 .

[34]  T. Budd,et al.  The extent and nature of stalking: findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey , 2000 .

[35]  Paul Bocij,et al.  Cyberstalking: Harassment in the Internet Age and How to Protect Your Family , 2004 .

[36]  Paul Higgs,et al.  Internet use and the digital divide in the English longitudinal study of ageing , 2008, European journal of ageing.

[37]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[38]  S. Bauman,et al.  Cyber and bias-based harassment: associations with academic, substance use, and mental health problems. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[39]  Nancy Thoennes,et al.  Stalking in America : findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey , 1998 .

[40]  C. Draucker "Living in hell": the experience of being stalked. , 1999, Issues in mental health nursing.

[41]  William A. Gerber The Internet in Britain 2009 , 2009 .

[42]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Online Data Collection: Strategies for Research. , 2004 .

[43]  James Barnes,et al.  The Impact of Cyberstalking , 2015 .