Recommending peers for learning: Matching on dissimilarity in interpretations to provoke breakdown

People recommenders are a widespread feature of social networking sites and educational social learning platforms alike. However, when these systems are used to extend learners' Personal Learning Networks, they often fall short of providing recommendations of learning value to their users. This paper proposes a design of a people recommender based on content-based user profiles, and a matching method based on dissimilarity therein. It presents the results of an experiment conducted with curators of the content curation site Scoop.it!, where curators rated personalized recommendations for contacts. The study showed that matching dissimilarity of interpretations of shared interests is more successful in providing positive experiences of breakdown for the curator than is matching on similarity. The main conclusion of this paper is that people recommenders should aim to trigger constructive experiences of breakdown for their users, as the prospect and potential of such experiences encourage learners to connect to their recommended peers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Hugh Dubberly,et al.  ON MODELINGWhat is conversation, and how can we design for it? , 2009, INTR.

[2]  Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke,et al.  Understanding personal learning networks: Their structure, content and the networking skills needed to optimally use them , 2012, First Monday.

[3]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[4]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  On the Importance of Subtext in Recommender Systems , 2015, i-com.

[5]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Identifying Opportunities for Valuable Encounters: Toward Context-Aware Social Matching Systems , 2015, TOIS.

[6]  Hong Joo Lee,et al.  Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[8]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[9]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cohere: A Prototype for Contested Collective Intelligence , 2010 .

[10]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Which Recommender System Can Best Fit Social Learning Platforms? , 2014, EC-TEL.

[11]  Francis Brouns,et al.  Using peer-support to connect learning network participants to each other: an interdisciplinary approach , 2012, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[12]  Kim Barbour,et al.  The academic online: Constructing persona through the World Wide Web , 2012, First Monday.

[13]  Mark van Harmelen,et al.  Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[15]  Sophie Ahrens,et al.  Recommender Systems , 2012 .

[16]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[17]  Li Chen,et al.  Augmenting service recommender systems by incorporating contextual opinions from user reviews , 2015, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  A Trust-based Social Recommender for Teachers , 2012, RecSysTEL@EC-TEL.

[19]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Social matching: A framework and research agenda , 2005, TCHI.

[20]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[21]  P. Pangaro,et al.  What is Conversation? How Can We Design for Effective Conversation? , 2014 .

[22]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[23]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[24]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  The Concept of Breakdown in Heidegger, Leont'ev, and Dewey and Its Implications for Education , 1998 .

[25]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  To whom and why should I connect? Co-author recommendation based on powerful and similar peers , 2012 .

[26]  S. Buckingham Shum,et al.  Mapping the Matrix: Using Compendium as a Tool for Recording the Analytic Group , 2012 .

[27]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications - A Longitudinal Study , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites , 2009, CHI.

[29]  Li Chen,et al.  Recommender systems based on user reviews: the state of the art , 2015, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[30]  Robert A. Reiser,et al.  Group Cognition , 1988 .

[31]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[32]  Xiao-Jun Zeng,et al.  ISTS: Implicit social trust and sentiment based approach to recommender systems , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Eduardo Di Petta.  Henry Jenkins (2006), Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation , 2012 .

[34]  Peter Sloep,et al.  People in Personal Learning Networks: Analysing their Characteristics and Identifying Suitable Tools , 2012 .

[35]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[36]  Erik Duval,et al.  Recommender Systems for Learning , 2012, Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[37]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .