Decision Factors in Service Control on High-Frequency Metro Line: Importance in Service Delivery

Service control—the task of implementing the timetable in daily operations on a metro line—plays a key role in service delivery, because it influences the quality of the service provided to passengers. Shortfalls of previous research on the role and importance of service control have been noted. A framework intended to remedy some of these shortfalls is proposed. An important element of this framework is the description of the full decision environment in which service control takes place. On the basis of insights gained from extended visits to a control center, the reliability of the system is found to depend on many endogenous factors. These factors were not previously recognized in a comprehensive manner by either researchers or practitioners. Aside from the objectives of maintaining adequate levels of service from an operations perspective and minimizing the impact of schedule deviations on passengers, the management of crew and rolling stock, safety, and infrastructure capacity are major considerations in service control decisions. Given the uncertain environment in which service control operates, a strong preference was observed among controllers for manageable and robust control strategies. An example is discussed in which service controllers react to two similar disruptions with different recovery strategies, mainly because of crew management considerations. This research demonstrates the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the objectives and constraints faced by service controllers in daily operations.

[1]  Cameron G. Walker,et al.  Simultaneous disruption recovery of a train timetable and crew roster in real time , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation , 2007 .

[3]  Xu Jun Eberlein Real-time control stategies in transit operations : models and analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  An Optimal Integrated Real-time Disruption Control Model for Rail Transit Systems , 2001 .

[5]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice , 2007 .

[6]  T. P. Hutchinson,et al.  A Behavioural Explanation of the Association Between Bus and Passenger Arrivals at a Bus Stop , 1975 .

[7]  G. F. Newell,et al.  Control Strategies for an Idealized Public Transportation System , 1972 .

[8]  Angela Mary Moore,et al.  A process for improving transit service management during disruptions , 2003 .

[9]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Optimal real-time control strategies for Rail transit operations during disruptions , 1999 .

[10]  Gang Yu,et al.  Optimization Model and Algorithm for Crew Management During Airline Irregular Operations , 1997, J. Comb. Optim..

[11]  JONATHAN F. BARD,et al.  Optimizing Aircraft Routings in response to Groundings and Delays , 2001 .

[12]  Andrzej Turnau,et al.  Simulation support tool for real-time dispatching control in public transport , 1998 .

[13]  Rabi G. Mishalani,et al.  Service Reliability Measurement Using Automated Fare Card Data , 2010 .

[14]  David Koffman,et al.  A SIMULATION STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE REAL-TIME BUS HEADWAY CONTROL STRATEGIES , 1977 .

[15]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF HEADWAY VARIATION ON TRANSIT ROUTES , 1986 .

[16]  André Puong,et al.  A real-time train holding model for rail transit systems , 2001 .

[17]  Adam B Rahbee Rail transit operations analysis : framework and applications , 2001 .