Soybean crop coverage estimation from NDVI images with different spatial resolution to evaluate yield variability in a plot

Abstract To explore precision farming profits, the variability within a plot can be evaluated using digital technology by different remote means. The objectives of this study were to determine crop coverage (CC) of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril) with Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data obtained by digital photographs on the field and from the satellites LANDSAT (7 and 8), with an overpass each 16 days and a pixel of 30 m, and PROBA-V, which has daily frequency and 100 m of spatial resolution, in order to evaluate productivity differences between sectors of a 45 ha rainfed plot located at south of Cordoba city, Argentina. In the plot, sowed on 22/11/2014 and harvested on 10/04/2015, 16 sampling areas were established to record periodically photographs with a modified camera and, in 8 of them, supplementary crop information. A non-linear model was developed from NDVI data of digital camera (NDVIC) to estimate the soybean CC that showed an appropriate predictive performance. Furthermore, NDVI data of LANDSAT (7 and 8) (NDVIL) and PROBA-V (NDVIP-V) were also applied to estimate CC, resulting in models whose structure and accuracy was similar to that obtained with the digital camera (R2 = 0.956 and 0.939, respectively). According to the radiometric information the two instruments provide, the digital images classification procedure to determine CC requires increasing the threshold from 0.0 to 0.05 when soybean progresses towards the maturation and senescence stages and green material is mixed with the senescent one. Growing conditions were very favorable for soybean in 2014–2015, since precipitation (PP) not only showed a marked continuity with 60 rainy days during the cycle, but also 642 mm accumulated in this period far exceeded maximum evapotranspiration (ETmax) of 389 mm. The CC had a major development in all sectors, maintaining a complete coverage condition for more than 50 days during most of the reproductive stage. However, prevalent overcast sky restricted significantly solar radiation (SR) and reduced potential yield (PY) to an average value close to 6000 kg ha−1 which, according to the plot yield map, produced a reduced yield gap (YG) between 10.6 and 19.8%. From the proposed model and with the NDVI data of LANDSAT 7 (NDVI7), soybean CC was estimated in the same plot for 2010–2011. Water availability were less favorable in this case, with accumulated values of 584 mm and 460 mm, for PP and ETmax, respectively, while a higher availability of SR during the crop season increased notably PY that reached a range between 7347 and 8224 kg ha−1. Moreover, lower water availability was evidenced increasing YG in the plot (40–53%). From the spatial evaluation carried out, only one-third of the plot located at the south reached the highest productivity in both crop seasons, leaving open the question about the weather influence in each productive cycle with respect to the effectiveness of the site-specific management.

[1]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Comparison Between Fractional Vegetation Cover Retrievals from Vegetation Indices and Spectral Mixture Analysis: Case Study of PROBA/CHRIS Data Over an Agricultural Area , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  J. Wolf,et al.  How good is good enough? Data requirements for reliable crop yield simulations and yield-gap analysis , 2015 .

[3]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Quantification of grain yield response to soil depth in Soybean, Maize, Sunflower, and Wheat , 2001 .

[4]  Charlie Walker,et al.  Estimating the nitrogen status of crops using a digital camera , 2010 .

[5]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[6]  David P. Roy,et al.  A contemporary decennial examination of changing agricultural field sizes using Landsat time series data , 2015, Geo : geography and environment.

[7]  R. Pu,et al.  Remote sensing of seasonal variability of fractional vegetation cover and its object-based spatial pattern analysis over mountain areas , 2013 .

[8]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height , 2009, Irrigation Science.

[9]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Opportunities and limitations for image-based remote sensing in precision crop management , 1997 .

[10]  Naftali Lazarovitch,et al.  A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning , 2014 .

[11]  Mustafa Turker,et al.  Sequential masking classification of multi‐temporal Landsat7 ETM+ images for field‐based crop mapping in Karacabey, Turkey , 2005 .

[12]  A. D. L. Casa,et al.  Empleo del NDVI de una cámara digital modificada para estimar la cobertura del cultivo de papa bajo distintas condiciones de fertilización nitrogenada , 2016 .

[13]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Crop condition and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  An alternative method using digital cameras for continuous monitoring of crop status , 2012 .

[15]  G. Ovando,et al.  Estimating maize ground cover using spectral data from Aqua-MODIS in Córdoba, Argentina , 2014 .

[16]  L. Deng,et al.  UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: A comparison between different cameras , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Chunhua Zhang,et al.  The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[18]  Andreas Burkart,et al.  Deploying four optical UAV-based sensors over grassland: challenges and limitations , 2015 .

[19]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description , 2009 .

[20]  Guijun Yang,et al.  Winter wheat yield estimation based on multi-source medium resolution optical and radar imaging data and the AquaCrop model using the particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2017 .

[21]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Upscaling ground observations of vegetation water content, canopy height, and leaf area index during SMEX02 using aircraft and Landsat imagery , 2004 .

[22]  J. Wolf,et al.  Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review , 2013 .

[23]  W. Dierckx,et al.  PROBA-V mission for global vegetation monitoring: standard products and image quality , 2014 .

[24]  T. Ochsner,et al.  Canopeo: A Powerful New Tool for Measuring Fractional Green Canopy Cover , 2015, Agronomy Journal.

[25]  A. Rollán,et al.  Compactación y retención hídrica en Haplustoles de la provincia de Córdoba (Argentina) bajo siembra directa , 2014 .

[26]  Yuwei Li,et al.  Combining Estimation of Green Vegetation Fraction in an Arid Region from Landsat 7 ETM+ Data , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[27]  D. Roy,et al.  Conterminous United States crop field size quantification from multi-temporal Landsat data , 2015 .

[28]  Xihan Mu,et al.  A novel method for extracting green fractional vegetation cover from digital images , 2012 .

[29]  Jiyul Chang,et al.  Corn (Zea mays L.) Yield Prediction Using Multispectral and Multidate Reflectance , 2003 .

[30]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[31]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Evaluating Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices for Precision Farming Applications from UAV Images , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[32]  L. C. Purcell,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency and Biomass Production in Soybean at Different Plant Population Densities. , 2002, Crop science.

[33]  Douglas E. Karcher,et al.  Batch Analysis of Digital Images to Evaluate Turfgrass Characteristics , 2005 .

[34]  J. L. Dardanelli,et al.  ROOTING DEPTH AND SOIL WATER EXTRACTION PATTERNS OF DIFFERENT CROPS IN A SILTY LOAM HAPLUSTOLL , 1997 .

[35]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Canopy Coverage and Light Interception Measurements Using Digital Imagery , 2000 .

[36]  Ammatzia Peled,et al.  Geographical model for precise agriculture monitoring with real-time remote sensing , 2009 .

[37]  J. G. Lyon,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices , 2016 .

[38]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  Assessment of digital camera-derived vegetation indices in quantitative monitoring of seasonal rice growth , 2011 .

[39]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions , 2008 .

[40]  Bastian Siegmann,et al.  CROP GROUND COVER FRACTION AND CANOPY CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT MAPPING USING RAPIDEYE IMAGERY , 2015 .

[41]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Remote Sensing Estimation of Crop Biophysical Characteristics at Various Scales , 2016 .

[42]  David B. Lobell,et al.  Remote sensing of regional crop production in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico: estimates and uncertainties , 2003 .

[43]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Agricultural Remote Sensing using Radio-Controlled Model Aircraft , 2015 .

[44]  Felix B. Fritschi,et al.  Ground‐Based Digital Imaging as a Tool to Assess Soybean Growth and Yield , 2014 .

[45]  Stephan J. Maas,et al.  Estimating Ground Cover of Field Crops Using Medium-Resolution Multispectral Satellite Imagery , 2008 .

[46]  L. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Biomass and Nitrogen Accumulation Rates and Radiation Use Efficiency in a Maximum Yield Environment , 2014 .

[47]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Advances in Remote Sensing of Agriculture: Context Description, Existing Operational Monitoring Systems and Major Information Needs , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[48]  N. Saigusa,et al.  Spectral vegetation indices as the indicator of canopy photosynthetic productivity in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2013 .

[49]  S. Blackmore,et al.  The Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Trends in Yield Map Data over Six Years , 2003 .

[50]  Megan M. Lewis,et al.  Testing the Temporal Ability of Landsat Imagery and Precision Agriculture Technology to Provide High Resolution Historical Estimates of Wheat Yield at the Farm Scale , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[51]  Thomas J. Trout,et al.  Satellite NDVI Assisted Monitoring of Vegetable Crop Evapotranspiration in California's San Joaquin Valley , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[52]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Relationship between fraction of radiation absorbed by photosynthesizing maize and soybean canopies and NDVI from remotely sensed data taken at close range and from MODIS 250 m resolution data , 2014 .

[53]  Kenneth G. Cassman,et al.  High-yield irrigated maize in the Western U.S. Corn Belt: I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and impact of agronomic practices , 2011 .

[54]  J. Passioura,et al.  Improving Productivity of Crops in Water-Limited Environments , 2010 .

[55]  Suhas P. Wani,et al.  Analysis of potential yields and yield gaps of rainfed soybean in India using CROPGRO-Soybean model , 2008 .

[56]  D. Mulla,et al.  Key processes and properties for site-specific soil and crop management. , 1997 .

[57]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population Among Diverse Maturity Groups: I. Agronomic Characteristics , 2005 .