Prospective life cycle assessment of the Spanish electricity production

This paper presents a set of prospective LCA studies of electricity production technologies of the Spanish mix from 2014 to 2050. The projection of the power system has been done by using the TIMES-Spain energy model, in which two prospective scenarios have been implemented, a Business as Usual (BaU) and other with a target of 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050 with respect to 2005 levels. Accordingly, projections of ten LCA impact categories have been obtained. Concerning the evolution of the electricity mix, the coal power plants retirement by 2020 has been observed in both scenarios. The main differences befall on the natural gas contribution, higher in the BaU scenario than in 80% scenario and connected to the Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plants usage. In addition, LCA categories selected show overall reductions in the long term reaching from 21% in Ozone Depletion to 85% in Acidification in the BaU scenario, and from 56% in Ecosystems to 87% in Acidification in the 80% scenario. However, Abiotic Depletion potential grows up to 5-times by 2050 due to the metal requirements of the solar photovoltaic technologies, significantly present in the mix. Likewise, the analysis of the endpoint categories (Human Health and Ecosystems) concludes that their evolution is much affected by the presence of the natural gas CHPs and, furthermore, existing fossil options are the main cause of damage by far. Hence a fossil-renewable transition is needed in terms of sustainability. In summary, it is recommended to use energy systems modelling frameworks to develop comprehensive prospective LCA studies.

[1]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  Integration of life-cycle indicators into energy optimisation models: The case study of power generation in Norway , 2016 .

[2]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Diego García-Gusano.  Long-Term Analysis of the Spanish Environmental Policies using the Life Cycle Assessment Method and Energy Optimisation Modelling , 2014 .

[4]  M. Salvia,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment, ExternE and Comprehensive Analysis for an integrated evaluation of the environmental impact of anthropogenic activities , 2009 .

[5]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments , 2009 .

[6]  Julio Lumbreras Martin,et al.  Impact of Spanish electricity mix, over the period 2008–2030, on the Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of Electric, Hybrid Diesel-Electric, Fuel Cell Hybrid and Diesel Bus of the Madrid Transportation System , 2013 .

[7]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Challenges in Soft-Linking: The Case of EMEC and TIMES-Sweden , 2013 .

[8]  Yolanda Lechón,et al.  Long-term behaviour of CO2 emissions from cement production in Spain: scenario analysis using an energy optimisation model , 2015 .

[9]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Environmental implications of decarbonising electricity supply in large economies: The case of Mexico , 2014 .

[10]  Christian Bauer,et al.  The environmental footprint of UAE׳s electricity sector: Combining life cycle assessment and scenario modeling , 2016 .

[11]  Fabio Menten,et al.  Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case , 2015 .

[12]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  Energy models from a strategic environmental assessment perspective in an EU context: What is missing concerning renewables? , 2014 .

[13]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy systems: Integrating environmental, economic and social aspects , 2014 .

[14]  C.-O. Wene,et al.  Energy-Economy-Analysis. Linking the Macroeconomic and Systems Engineering Approaches , 1996 .

[15]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion , 2007 .

[16]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Jun-Ki Choi,et al.  Implications of energy policy on a product system's dynamic life-cycle environmental impact: Survey and model , 2012 .

[18]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[19]  Yolanda Lechón,et al.  Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production by Solarthermal Power Plants in Spain , 2008 .

[20]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[21]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA , 2010 .

[22]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  The implementation of the EU renewable directive in Spain. Strategies and challenges , 2010 .

[23]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of UK electricity scenarios to 2070 , 2014 .

[24]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[25]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Material flows and economic models: an analytical comparison of SFA, LCA and partial equilibrium models , 2000 .

[26]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Economic and Technological Models for Evaluation of Energy Policy , 1977 .

[27]  Carla Pieragostini,et al.  On process optimization considering LCA methodology. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.