Structuring Online and Offline Discursive Spaces on Internet Governance. Insights from a Network Approach to Map an Emergent Field.

Internet governance (IG) is quickly emerging both as a field of political practices at global level and as an object of interdisciplinary research. Although the debate on this matter has started with the birth of the Internet itself, three features characterize the contemporary phase of debate and mark its peculiarity in comparison with the past. In first place, Internet governance has become a global social problem soliciting the interest of a plurality of actors of different nature (governmental and non governmental). Nonetheless, despite this undeniable relevance, Internet governance remains characterized by a twofold uncertainty: in first place, thematic boundary uncertainty or, in other words, what is meant with Internet governance and who are actors involved in the discussion; secondly, political uncertainty or, in other words, what are preferred political arrangements to put Internet governance in practice efficiently thus keeping into account modifications intervened in its contents since a larger constituency of actors has stepped onto global stages in order to participate to the discussion. The status of global issue, boundaries and political uncertainty impose the necessity to develop multi-faceted methodologies for the study of contemporary phase of Internet governance discussion.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  James E. Katz Social consequences of internet use , 2002 .

[3]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[4]  D. Mcadam Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970 , 1982 .

[5]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  A. Melucci Altri codici : aree di movimento nella metropoli , 1984 .

[7]  Joseph E. Schwartz,et al.  An Examination of Concor and Related Methods for Blocking Sociometric Data , 1977 .

[8]  R. Mayntz,et al.  Introduction: Studying Policy Networks , 1991 .

[9]  C. Haythornthwaite,et al.  The Internet in Everyday Life: An Introduction , 2008 .

[10]  P. Kenis,et al.  Policy networks and policy analysis : Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox , 1991 .

[11]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[12]  Ann Mische,et al.  CROSS-TALK IN MOVEMENTS: RECONCEIVING THE CULTURE- NETWORK LINK , 2000 .

[13]  J. Torfing Grasping governance networks , 2003 .

[14]  J. Martin,et al.  What Is Field Theory?1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Dimitrios Christopoulos Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: a network perspective , 2006 .

[16]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  S. Ungar THE RISE AND (RELATIVE) DECLINE OF GLOBAL WARMING AS A SOCIAL PROBLEM , 1992 .

[18]  J. Hofmann,et al.  Internet Governance: A Regulative Idea in Flux , 2005 .

[19]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[20]  David Marsh,et al.  Comparing policy networks , 1998 .

[21]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Marc W. Steinberg,et al.  Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn , 1998 .

[23]  D. Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective , 1992 .

[24]  Mario Diani,et al.  Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement , 1995 .

[25]  S. Adam,et al.  The Network Approach , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[26]  Antonio Pasquali,et al.  A brief descriptive glossary of communication and information (aimed at providing clarification and improving mutual understanding) , 2003 .

[27]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action , 2003 .

[28]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[29]  R. Breiger The Duality of Persons and Groups , 1974 .

[30]  A. Melucci Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age , 1997 .

[31]  Mette Zølner,et al.  Methods for Network Governance Research: an Introduction , 2007 .

[32]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .

[33]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  What's so Special About Policy Networks? An Exploration of the Concept and its Usefulness in Studying European Governance , 2002 .

[34]  M. Hemmati Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict , 2002 .

[35]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Things of Boundaries , 1995 .

[36]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[37]  Anthony Mcgrew,et al.  Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture , 2000 .

[38]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .