Comment: Snowball versus Respondent-Driven Sampling

Leo Goodman (2011) provided a useful service with his clarification of the differences among snowball sampling as originally introduced by Coleman (1958–1959) and Goodman (1961) as a means for studying the structure of social networks; snowball sampling as a convenience method for studying hard-to-reach populations (Biernacki and Waldorf 1981); and respondent-driven sampling (RDS), a sampling method with good estimability for studying hard-to-reach populations (Heckathorn 1997, 2002, 2007; Salganik and Heckathorn 2004; Volz and Heckathorn 2008). This comment offers a clarification of a related set of issues. One is confusion between the latter form of snowball sampling, and RDS. A second is confusion resulting from multiple forms of the RDS estimator that derives from the incremental manner in which the method was developed. This comment summarizes the development of the method, distinguishing among seven forms of the estimator.

[1]  Mohsen Malekinejad,et al.  Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Methodology for HIV Biological and Behavioral Surveillance in International Settings: A Systematic Review , 2008, AIDS and Behavior.

[2]  R. Garfein,et al.  Ethical and regulatory considerations in HIV prevention studies employing respondent-driven sampling. , 2009, The International journal on drug policy.

[3]  B. Werble.  Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1966 .

[4]  J. Coleman.  Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods , 1958 .

[5]  Mark S Handcock,et al.  7. Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology , 2009, Sociological methodology.

[6]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[7]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SAMPLING OF SPECIAL POPULATIONS , 1986 .

[8]  M. Spreen.  Rare Populations, Hidden Populations, and Link-Tracing Designs: What and Why? , 1992 .

[9]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hi , 2002 .

[10]  H. Becker,et al.  Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. , 1964 .

[11]  Bonnie H. Erickson,et al.  Some Problems of Inference from Chain Data , 1979 .

[12]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[13]  L. A. Goodman.  Comment: On Respondent-Driven Sampling and Snowball Sampling in Hard-to-Reach Populations and Snowball Sampling Not in Hard-to-Reach Populations , 2011 .

[14]  Erik M. Volz,et al.  Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Respondent‐driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  Cyprian Wejnert,et al.  3. An Empirical Test of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Point Estimates, Variance, Degree Measures, and Out-of-Equilibrium Data , 2009, Sociological methodology.

[17]  Tobi Saidel,et al.  Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. , 2005, AIDS.

[18]  D. Heckathorn.  6. Extensions of Respondent-Driven Sampling: Analyzing Continuous Variables and Controlling for Differential Recruitment , 2007 .

[19]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  A probabilistic approach to networks , 1979 .

[20]  Matthew J. Salganik.  Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven Sampling , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[21]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[22]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  From Networks to Populations: The Development and Application of Respondent-Driven Sampling Among IDUs and Latino Gay Men , 2005, AIDS and Behavior.