Manufacturer Predicted And Measured REAR Values In Adult Hearing Aid Fitting: Accuracy And Clinical Usefulness

Audiologists may fit hearing aids using real-ear aided response (REAR) values predicted by manufacturer's fitting software, rather than actual measured REARs. This study examined how well one manufacturer's software was able to predict REARs for a DSP behind-the-ear product in 41 adults (N = 79 ears) under four conditions (two hearing loss configurations and two inputs). Results showed that for all ears tested, measured REAR values were significantly different from predicted for most of the audiometric frequencies for all four test conditions. Discrepancies between measured and predicted REAR values were greater in males’ ears than females’. Few ears’ REAR values (≤12%) were judged to be clinically similar to predicted. Results suggest audiologists should consider using individual real-ear measures in adult hearing aid fittings until manufacturer software is shown to accurately predict real-ear hearing aid performance.

[1]  David B. Hawkins,et al.  Hearing aid software predictive gain values: How accurate are they? , 2003 .

[2]  H. Gustav Mueller.  In the words of Shakespeare: Fitting test protocols are “more honored in the breach than the observance” , 2003 .

[3]  W. Kannel,et al.  Hearing in the elderly: the Framingham cohort, 1983-1985. Part I. Basic audiometric test results. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Sergei Kochkin.  Consumers Rate Improvements Sought in Hearing Instruments , 2002 .

[5]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  Proprietary fitting algorithms compared with one another and with generic formulas , 2003 .

[6]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[7]  S. E. Voss,et al.  Middle Ear Pathology Can Affect the Ear‐Canal Sound Pressure Generated by Audiologic Earphones , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  Is probe‐mic measurement of HA gain‐frequency response best practice? , 2003 .

[9]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh : Analyzing and Understanding Data , 2004 .

[10]  K J Munro,et al.  Customized Acoustic Transform Functions and Their Accuracy at Predicting Real‐Ear Hearing Aid Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[11]  D L Zelisko,et al.  Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Susan B. Gerber,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows , 1999 .

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J. Heller,et al.  Screening tympanometry: criteria for medical referral. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[15]  Dianne Easterling,et al.  March , 1890, The Hospital.

[16]  Suzanne C. Purdy,et al.  Probe Microphone Placement for Real Ear Measurement , 1997 .

[17]  Francis M. Wiener,et al.  The Pressure Distribution in the Auditory Canal in a Progressive Sound Field , 1946 .

[18]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Making Pressure Measurements in Insert Earphone Couplers and Real Ears , 1972 .

[19]  Todd-Malmlov.  April , 1872, The Hospital.

[20]  S Fikret-Pasa,et al.  Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  J Jerger,et al.  Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.