Time Spent, Workload, and Student and Faculty Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment

Objective. To evaluate student perception and time spent on asynchronous online lectures in a blended learning environment (BLE) and to assess faculty workload and perception. Methods. Students (n=427) time spent viewing online lectures was measured in three courses. Students and faculty members completed a survey to assess perceptions of a BLE. Faculty members recorded time spent creating BLEs. Results. Total time spent in the BLE was less than the allocated time for two of the three courses by 3-15%. Students preferred online lectures for their flexibility, students’ ability to apply information learned, and congruence with their learning styles. Faculty members reported the BLE facilitated higher levels of learning during class sessions but noted an increase in workload. Conclusion. A BLE increased faculty workload but was well received by students. Time spent viewing online lectures was less than what was allocated in two of the three courses.

[1]  Adam M Persky,et al.  Transforming a Large-Class Lecture Course to a Smaller-Group Interactive Course , 2010, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[2]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[3]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[4]  David A Cook,et al.  Web-based learning a systematic review of the variability of interventions , 2011 .

[5]  Dylan M Glatt,et al.  The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  Guido Heydecke,et al.  A model of blended learning in a preclinical course in prosthetic dentistry. , 2015, Journal of dental education.

[7]  K. Suda,et al.  Student perception and academic performance after implementation of a blended learning approach to a drug information and literature evaluation course , 2014 .

[8]  Jacqueline E. McLaughlin,et al.  Comparison of an interactive e-learning preparatory tool and a conventional downloadable handout used within a flipped neurologic pharmacotherapy lecture , 2015 .

[9]  Andrea Edginton,et al.  A Blended Learning Approach to Teaching Basic Pharmacokinetics and the Significance of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2010, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[10]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Marjorie Vai,et al.  Essentials of Online Course Design: A Standards-Based Guide , 2011 .

[12]  W. F. Rudd Department of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy , 1926 .

[13]  M. Crouch An advanced cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course blending online and face-to-face instruction. , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[14]  A. Persky Qualitative Analysis of Animation versus Reading for Pre-Class Preparation in a "Flipped" Classroom. , 2015 .

[15]  P. Glasziou,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine , 2015, BMC medical education.

[16]  C. Maresca,et al.  Utilization of blended learning to teach preclinical endodontics. , 2014, Journal of dental education.

[17]  Julia Khanova,et al.  The Impact of Blended Learning on Student Performance in a Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Course , 2015, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[18]  Mariana Lapidus,et al.  Combined Use of Online Tutorials and Hands-On Group Exercises in Bibliographic Instruction for Pharmacy Students , 2012, Medical reference services quarterly.

[19]  Jennifer A. Phillips Replacing traditional live lectures with online learning modules: Effects on learning and student perceptions , 2015 .