A positioning device for computed tomography: a clinical report.

This clinical report describes a device (Centrascan) used to assist in the correct alignment of the patient's head during computed tomography (CT) assessment of a proposed implant site. To obtain the desired anatomic detail, CT requires precise alignment of the axial images at right angles to the long axis of the proposed implant. This clinical report compared the anatomic morphology of a projected implant site derived from axial images provided by DentaScan software analysis of the CT scan acquisition. Images from a conventional scan, with the patient's head aligned along the frontal plane (perpendicular to the Frankfort plane) and along the sagittal plane (coinciding with either the cortical bone of the hard palate or the inferior border of the mandible), were compared with images acquired by use of the Centrascan device. The two scans differed substantially. In particular, the cross-sectional images obtained by the conventional procedure showed a distorted anatomy; conversely, the images obtained by the Centrascan procedure showed a better reproduction of the examined area. The Centrascan device seemed to help the radiologist achieve a more correct alignment of the patient's head during CT scan acquisition. Further studies are necessary to fully explore the relative technical merits of the Centrascan device.

[1]  P Suetens,et al.  Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three-dimensional approach. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  C Lindh,et al.  Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  M S Schwarz,et al.  Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. , 1989, Dental clinics of North America.

[4]  N L Frederiksen,et al.  Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  L A Weinberg,et al.  CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  D A Tyndall,et al.  Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  M. S. Schwarz,et al.  Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  D Kohavi,et al.  Effect of axial plane deviation on cross-sectional height in reformatted computed tomography of the mandible. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Three-dimensional dental arch curvature in human adolescents and adults. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  The use of tomography for dental implant planning. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  Abrahams Jj,et al.  The role of diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. , 1993 .