On the biogeography of seed mass in Germany - distribution patterns and environmental correlates

With environmental factors being spatially structured, plant traits that are related to these factors should exhibit a corresponding spatial pattern. We analyzed the distribution pattern of seed mass in Germany. We calculated the median seed mass for 10? longitude by 6? latitude grid cells across Germany using the trait databases BIOLFLOR and the plant distribution database FLORKART. To explain these distribution patterns of median seed mass, we applied multiple regression analyses on twelve selected environmental variables, accounting for spatial autocorrelation. To deal with collinearities of the predictors, we used hierarchical partitioning to analyze the independent and joint explanatory power of the environmental variables. To test whether statistical relationships are due to hidden correlations between seed mass and plant growth form, we conducted seperate analyses for annuals, perennial herbs, shrubs and trees. Low median seed mass was found in the lowlands and river valleys whereas high median seed mass was typical for the rich loess regions and the calcareous mountain ranges. Seed mass exhibited a strong positive correlation with soil pH (62% of variance explained) and a negative correlation with soil moisture (25%). Light was less important as a predictor of seed mass. Within the growth forms we observed similar distribution and correlation patterns pointing to a direct link between seed mass and the environmental variables soil pH and moisture. We argue that this striking relationship with soil pH is caused by the high stress from competition on fertile calcareous sites. The negative moisture effect may be due to drought stress. Both relationships are particulary interesting for the prediction of ecosystem responses to climate and land use changes.

[1]  H. Ellenberg.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[2]  Sebastian Schmidtlein,et al.  Revealing biogeographical patterns by nonlinear ordinations and derived anisotropic spatial filters , 2008 .

[3]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models , 2007 .

[4]  M. Diekmann,et al.  Changes in species density along the soil pH gradient — evidence from German plant communities , 2003, Folia Geobotanica.

[5]  J. Ewald.  The calcareous riddle: Why are there so many calciphilous species in the Central European flora? , 2003, Folia Geobotanica.

[6]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global patterns in seed size , 2006 .

[7]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns , 2006 .

[8]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Invasibility: the Local mechanism driving community assembly and species diversity , 2005 .

[9]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[10]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Factors that shape seed mass evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. Schütz,et al.  Seed weight increases with altitude in the Swiss Alps between related species but not among populations of individual species , 2005, Oecologia.

[12]  Ken Thompson,et al.  The Ecology of Seeds by Michael Fenner , 2005 .

[13]  K. Thompson,et al.  The Ecology of Seeds: References , 2005 .

[14]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature , 2004 .

[15]  M. Westoby,et al.  Small‐seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime , 2004 .

[16]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[17]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Patterns in the species–environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables , 2004 .

[18]  C. Dickman,et al.  Geographical gradients in seed mass in relation to climate , 2004 .

[19]  R. M. Nally.  Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[20]  A. Purvis,et al.  Seed size and establishment conditions in tropical trees , 1993, Oecologia.

[21]  I. Kühn,et al.  The flora of German cities is naturally species rich , 2004 .

[22]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed size and survival in the soil in arid Australia , 2003 .

[23]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[24]  M. Westoby,et al.  Latitude, seed predation and seed mass , 2003 .

[25]  M. Diekmann.  Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review , 2003 .

[26]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[27]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis , 2002 .

[28]  T. Simons,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology , 2002 .

[29]  M. Leishman.  Does the seed size/number trade‐off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality , 2001 .

[30]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Seed Size, Fruit Size, and Dispersal Systems in Angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous to the Late Tertiary , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[31]  O. Eriksson,et al.  A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants , 2000 .

[32]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients , 1999 .

[33]  J. Bakker,et al.  Ecological correlates of seed size in the British flora , 1998 .

[34]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity , 1998 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size , 1996 .

[36]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal , 1996 .

[37]  Adaptation and inertia in the Australian tropical lowland rain-forest flora: Contradictory trends in intergeneric and intrageneric comparisons of seed size in relation to light demand , 1996 .

[38]  K. Thompson,et al.  More on the biogeography of scarce vascular plants , 1996 .

[39]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Spatial Dependence in Linear Regression Models with an Introduction to Spatial Econometrics , 1995 .

[40]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results , 1995 .

[41]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  The role of seed size in seedling establishment in dry soil conditions - Experimental evidence from semi-arid species , 1994 .

[42]  M. Westoby,et al.  The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence , 1994 .

[43]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[44]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  B. Shipley,et al.  The Allometry of Seed Production in Herbaceous Angiosperms , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[47]  S. D. Hendrix,et al.  Are seedlings from small seeds always inferior to seedlings from large seeds? Effects of seed biomass on seedling growth in Pastinaca sativa L. , 1991, The New phytologist.

[48]  A. Davy.  Comparative plant ecology: A functional approach to common British species , 1990 .

[49]  M. Fenner,et al.  MINERAL NUTRIENT ALLOCATION IN SEEDS AND SHOOTS OF TWELVE CHIONOCHLOA SPECIES IN RELATION TO SOIL FERTILITY , 1989 .

[50]  S. Mazer.  Ecological, Taxonomic, and Life History Correlates of Seed Mass Among Indiana Dune Angiosperms , 1989 .

[51]  Susan A. Foster,et al.  The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants , 1985 .

[52]  J. P. Grime.  Vegetation classification by reference to strategies , 1974, Nature.

[53]  Christopher C. Smith,et al.  The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[54]  H. G. Baker.  Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[55]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Seedling Establishment in Vertical Gradients of Sunlight , 1965 .

[56]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .