Reading Math: A Comparison of Reading and Listening to Algebraic Problems

Digital text is being used in elementary and secondary education for students with and without disabilities, but without much consideration as to its impact on student outcomes. This single-subject alternating treatment design sought to understand how the performance of three secondary students with visual impairments was impacted by accessing algebra via a digital textbook in comparison to accessing it via a traditional textbook. The main findings of this study suggested that (a) students tended to solve the algebra equations better when they were presented via their traditional textbook; (b) task completion was longer for all three students when using the digital textbook, although the amount of time differed across students; and (c) two of the three students preferred their traditional textbook and one preferred the digital textbook. The results hold implications for the implementation of digital text in mathematics for students with disabilities and suggest that continued research is needed.

[1]  Lotta C. Larson Digital Readers: The Next Chapter in E‐Book Reading and Response , 2010 .

[2]  Amanda J. Rockinson-Szapkiw,et al.  Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  H. Gray,et al.  Keeping Up with the Technologically Savvy Student: Student Perceptions of Audio Books , 2011 .

[4]  Catherine S. Fichten,et al.  Accessibility of e-Learning and Computer and Information Technologies for Students with Visual Impairments in Postsecondary Education , 2009 .

[5]  Marcia A. Mardis,et al.  From Paper to Pixel: The Promise and Challenges of Digital Textbooks for K-12 Schools , 2013 .

[6]  Mark A. Horney,et al.  Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations , 2007 .

[7]  Gina Biancarosa,et al.  Technology Tools to Support Reading in the Digital Age , 2013, The Future of children.

[8]  S. Hayes,et al.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Kurt W. Fischer,et al.  Mind, Brain, and Education in the Digital Era , 2012 .

[10]  Helmut Jürgensen,et al.  Accessible presentation of information for people with visual disabilities , 2010, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years , 2005, J. Documentation.

[12]  C. Gregory,et al.  But I Want a Real Book : An Investigation of Undergraduates' Usage and Attitudes toward Electronic Books , 2008 .

[13]  Joseph J. Pedulla,et al.  Performance Differences According to Test Mode and Computer Familiarity on a Practice Graduate Record Exam , 2002 .

[14]  M. MacGregor,et al.  An exploration of aspects of language proficiency and Algebra learning , 1999 .

[15]  David B. Daniel,et al.  Electronic textbooks: why the rush? , 2012, Science.

[16]  J. Rowsell,et al.  Screen Pedagogy: Challenging Perceptions of Digital Reading Practice , 2008 .

[17]  Rob Reynolds,et al.  Trends Influencing the Growth of Digital Textbooks in US Higher Education , 2011 .

[18]  Emily C. Bouck,et al.  Accessing Algebra via MathSpeak™: Understanding the Potential and Pitfalls for Students with Visual Impairments , 2013 .

[19]  Enrico Pontelli,et al.  From "Reading" Math to "Doing" Math: A New Direction in Non-visual Math Accessibility , 2011, HCI.

[20]  J. Shepperd,et al.  Evaluating the Electronic Textbook: Is it Time to Dispense with the Paper Text? , 2008 .

[21]  Nancy K. Meyer,et al.  eText, Mathematics, and Students with Visual Impairments , 2012 .

[22]  Roberta H. Sloan,et al.  Using an eTextbook and iPad: Results of a Pilot Program , 2012 .

[23]  David B. Daniel,et al.  E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Jane N. Erin,et al.  Use of the Talking Tactile Tablet in Mathematics Testing , 2003 .