The Development of Family Companies: Management and Ownership Imperatives

This study explores management and ownership imperatives facing 427 independent unquoted (i.e., nonpublic) companies in the United Kingdom. To detect real rather than sample differences, the study used a matched pairs methodology. Chi-square and student's T-tests confirmed several similarities among the 73 family companies and the comparable 73 nonfamily companies. The tenure periods of CEOs in both groups of firms before being appointed to the CEO position were similar. CEOs in family firms had not remained in this position for significantly longer periods than CEOs in nonfamily firms, and the majority of directors in family and nonfamily firms did not hold outside directorships in other companies. Several significant differences were also detected. CEOs from the kinship group owning the family business had been in the CEO position for much longer than “outside” CEOs in family firms. Furthermore, the proportion of total shares owned by directors in family firms was significantly more than the proportion owned by directors in nonfamily firms. A significantly larger proportion of nonfamily rather than family firms had employed a nonexecutive director. In concluding, it is highlighted that a firm's identification of itself as a family firm is important in defining family firms and that firms that do not currently perceive themselves to be family firms may in the future.

[1]  P. Westhead.  Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non--family companies , 1997 .

[2]  David Devins,et al.  Supporting Established Micro Businesses: Policy Issues Emerging from an Evaluation , 1999 .

[3]  Reginald A. Litz.  THE FAMILY BUSINESS: TOWARD DEFINITIONAL CLARITY. , 1995 .

[4]  R. Gasson,et al.  THE FARM AS A FAMILY BUSINESS: A REVIEW , 1988 .

[5]  Ben Stephenson,et al.  The Management of Family Firms: An Empirical Investigation , 1995 .

[6]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command , 1994 .

[7]  Mark K. Fiegener,et al.  Passing on Strategic Vision: Favored Modes of Successor Preparation by CEOs of Family and Nonfamily Firms , 1996 .

[8]  W. Dyer,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Exploring the Connections , 1994 .

[9]  Ivan Lansberg,et al.  Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business , 1999 .

[10]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  TOP MANAGEMENT TURNOVER AND CEO SUCCESSION: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF TURNOVER ON PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[11]  Employment,et al.  Opportunity for all in a world of change , 2001 .

[12]  W. Handler.  Key Interpersonal Relationships of Next-Generation Family Members in Family Firms , 1991 .

[13]  Marc Cowling,et al.  Family Firm Research: The Need for a Methodological Rethink , 1998 .

[14]  Steven D. Goldberg.  Research Note: Effective Successors in Family-Owned Businesses: Significant Elements , 1996 .

[15]  John L. Ward,et al.  The family business : its governance for sustainability , 1998 .

[16]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  The Influence of Family on the Family Business Succession Process: a Multi-Generational Perspective , 1998 .

[17]  C. Hakim.  Identifying fast growth small firms , 1989 .

[18]  David Starr-Glass,et al.  Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice, and Policy , 2002 .

[19]  B. Johannisson,et al.  Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: an ideological challenge , 2000 .

[20]  W. Handler.  Succession in Family Business: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[21]  Sue Birley,et al.  The family and the business , 1999 .

[22]  J. Astrachan,et al.  Myths and Realities: Family Businesses' Contribution to the US Economy— A Framework for Assessing Family Business Statistics , 1996 .

[23]  Sue Birley,et al.  Owner-Manager Attitudes to Family and Business Issues: A 16 Country Study , 2001 .

[24]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  The Initial Succession: A Contingency Model of Founder Tenure , 1997 .

[25]  J. Solterer.  The Entrepreneur in Economic Theory , 1950 .

[26]  Chandra S. Mishra,et al.  Founding Family Control and Capital Structure: The Risk of Loss of Control and the Aversion to Debt , 1999 .

[27]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Correlates of success in family business transitions , 1997 .

[28]  William R. Sandberg.  Strategic Management's Potential Contributions to a Theory of Entrepreneurship , 1992 .

[29]  Mark K. Fiegener,et al.  The adoption of outside boards by small private US firms , 2000 .

[30]  Mark K. Fiegener,et al.  A Comparison of Successor Development in Family and Nonfamily Businesses , 1994 .

[31]  M. Cowling,et al.  Performance contrasts between family and non‐family unquoted companies in the UK , 1997 .

[32]  M. Fox,et al.  Managing Succession in Family-Owned Businesses , 1996 .

[33]  A. Kimhi.  Intergenerational Succession in Small Family Businesses: Borrowing Constraints and Optimal Timing of Succession , 1997 .

[34]  Frank Hoy,et al.  Emerging Business, Emerging Field: Entrepreneurship and the Family Firm , 1994 .

[35]  Monder Ram,et al.  Relative Merits: Family Culture and Kinship in Small Firms , 1993 .

[36]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists , 1997 .

[37]  E. Stavrou,et al.  Securing the Future of the Family Enterprise: A Model of Offspring Intentions to Join the Business , 1998 .

[38]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Defining the Family Business by Behavior , 1999 .

[39]  Rik Donckels,et al.  Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS , 1991 .

[40]  P. Westhead.  Factors Associated with the Employment of Non-Executive Directors by Unquoted Companies , 1999 .

[41]  Reginald A. Litz.  The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity , 1997 .