Ubiquitin not only serves as a tag but also assists degradation by inducing protein unfolding

Protein ubiquitination controls the cellular fate of numerous eukaryotic proteins. Despite its importance, many fundamental questions remain regarding its mechanism. One such question is how ubiquitination alters the biophysical properties of the modified protein and whether these alterations are significant in the cellular context. In this study, we investigate the effects of ubiquitination on the folding thermodynamics and mechanism of various substrates using computational tools and find that ubiquitination changes the thermal stability of modified proteins in a manner relevant to cellular processes. These changes depend on the substrate modification site and on the type of ubiquitination. Ubiquitination of the substrate Ubc7 at the residues that are modified in vivo prior to proteasomal degradation uniquely results in significant thermal destabilization and a local unwinding near the modification site, which indicates that ubiquitination possibly facilitates the unfolding process and improves substrate degradation efficiency. With respect to the substrate p194inkd, our results support a synergetic effect of ubiquitination and phosphorylation on the degradation process via enhanced thermal destabilization. Our study implies that, in addition to its known role as a recognition signal, the ubiquitin attachment may be directly involved in the cellular process it regulates by changing the biophysical properties of the substrate.

[1]  A. Matouschek,et al.  An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[2]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Studying the folding of multidomain proteins , 2008, HFSP journal.

[3]  Zhijian J. Chen,et al.  Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[4]  Joan-Emma Shea,et al.  The effect of surface tethering on the folding of the src-SH3 protein domain , 2009, Physical biology.

[5]  Linda Hicke,et al.  Ubiquitin-binding domains , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Cooperativity, connectivity, and folding pathways of multidomain proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  P. Coffino,et al.  Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[8]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Proteasome-mediated protein processing by bidirectional degradation initiated from an internal site , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  P. Kloetzel,et al.  The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Marc W. Kirschner,et al.  The Processivity of Multiubiquitination by the APC Determines the Order of Substrate Degradation , 2006, Cell.

[11]  Shoji Takada,et al.  How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Matouschek,et al.  ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[13]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The unfolding of substrates and ubiquitin-independent protein degradation by proteasomes. , 2001, Biochimie.

[14]  J. Bartek,et al.  Ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated degradation of p19INK4d determines its periodic expression during the cell cycle , 2000, Oncogene.

[15]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Protein unfolding by a AAA+ protease is dependent on ATP-hydrolysis rates and substrate energy landscapes , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  W. Stites,et al.  Effects of excluded volume upon protein stability in covalently cross-linked proteins with variable linker lengths. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[17]  G. Dittmar,et al.  Cell Cycle–Regulated Modification of the Ribosome by a Variant Multiubiquitin Chain , 2000, Cell.

[18]  A. Baumketner,et al.  Effects of surface tethering on protein folding mechanisms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Productive RUPture: activation of transcription factors by proteasomal processing. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  Daniel Kaganovich,et al.  Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments , 2008, Nature.

[21]  Martin Rechsteiner,et al.  Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[22]  C. Pickart,et al.  Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  A. Varshavsky.  The N-end rule , 1992, Cell.

[24]  George M. Church,et al.  Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sites , 2004, Bioinform..

[25]  Matthew P Jacobson,et al.  Computational studies of protein regulation by post-translational phosphorylation. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Nonnative electrostatic interactions can modulate protein folding: molecular dynamics with a grain of salt. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  V. Vacic,et al.  Identification, analysis, and prediction of protein ubiquitination sites , 2010, Proteins.

[28]  E. Pilipenko,et al.  Proteasomes can degrade a significant proportion of cellular proteins independent of ubiquitination. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  D. Finley,et al.  Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  T. Holak,et al.  Protein folding and stability of human CDK inhibitor p19(INK4d). , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  I. Ota,et al.  A Proteolytic Pathway That Recognizes Ubiquitin as a Degradation Signal (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  James M. Roberts,et al.  Ubiquitin-independent degradation of cell-cycle inhibitors by the REGgamma proteasome. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[33]  J R Yates,et al.  Selective degradation of ubiquitinated Sic1 by purified 26S proteasome yields active S phase cyclin-Cdk. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[34]  A. Varshavsky.  Discovery of Cellular Regulation by Protein Degradation , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Y. Levy,et al.  Folding of glycoproteins: toward understanding the biophysics of the glycosylation code. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  Nadine Homeyer,et al.  Conformational switch upon phosphorylation: human CDK inhibitor p19INK4d between the native and partially folded state. , 2009, ACS chemical biology.

[37]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Autoregulation of an E2 enzyme by ubiquitin-chain assembly on its catalytic residue , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[38]  R. Mayer,et al.  Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  A. Fersht,et al.  Adaptive evolution of p53 thermodynamic stability. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  J. Bartek,et al.  Distinct versus redundant properties among members of the INK4 family of cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitors , 2000, FEBS letters.

[41]  David D. Thomas,et al.  Site-specific methionine oxidation initiates calmodulin degradation by the 20S proteasome. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[42]  Alejandro Garcia,et al.  UbiProt: a database of ubiquitylated proteins , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  K A Dill,et al.  Stabilization of proteins in confined spaces. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[44]  M. Muratani,et al.  How the ubiquitin–proteasome system controls transcription , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  S. Teichmann,et al.  The folding and evolution of multidomain proteins , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  Erica S. Johnson,et al.  Methotrexate Inhibits Proteolysis of Dihydrofolate Reductase by the N-end Rule Pathway (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.