Tissue Rotation of the Xenopus Anterior–Posterior Neural Axis Reveals Profound but Transient Plasticity at the Mid-Gastrula Stage

The establishment of anterior–posterior (AP) regional identity is an essential step in the appropriate development of the vertebrate central nervous system. An important aspect of AP neural axis formation is the inherent plasticity that allows developing cells to respond to and recover from the various perturbations that embryos continually face during the course of development. While the mechanisms governing the regionalization of the nervous system have been extensively studied, relatively less is known about the nature and limits of early neural plasticity of the anterior–posterior neural axis. This study aims to characterize the degree of neural axis plasticity in Xenopus laevis by investigating the response of embryos to a 180-degree rotation of their AP neural axis during gastrula stages by assessing the expression of regional marker genes using in situ hybridization. Our results reveal the presence of a narrow window of time between the mid- and late gastrula stage, during which embryos are able undergo significant recovery following a 180-degree rotation of their neural axis and eventually express appropriate regional marker genes including Otx, Engrailed, and Krox. By the late gastrula stage, embryos show misregulation of regional marker genes following neural axis rotation, suggesting that this profound axial plasticity is a transient phenomenon that is lost by late gastrula stages.

[1]  A. Wills,et al.  Hif1α and Wnt are required for posterior gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tail regeneration. , 2022, Developmental biology.

[2]  C. Niehrs The role of Xenopus developmental biology in unraveling Wnt signalling and antero-posterior axis formation. , 2021, Developmental biology.

[3]  Jaebong Kim,et al.  The Organizer and Its Signaling in Embryonic Development , 2021, Journal of developmental biology.

[4]  Aditi Dubey,et al.  Anterior patterning genes induced by Zic1 are sensitive to retinoic acid and its metabolite, 4‐oxo‐RA , 2021, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[5]  Andrew L. Miller,et al.  Transmembrane H+ fluxes and the regulation of neural induction in Xenopus laevis. , 2021, Zygote.

[6]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain. , 2021, Development.

[7]  S. Sokol,et al.  The dorsal blastopore lip is a source of signals inducing planar cell polarity in the Xenopus neural plate , 2021, Biology open.

[8]  H. Willsey,et al.  Xenopus leads the way: Frogs as a pioneering model to understand the human brain , 2020, Genesis.

[9]  N. Sasai,et al.  Neural induction: Historical views and application to pluripotent stem cells , 2020, Development, growth & differentiation.

[10]  M. Lutolf,et al.  Gastruloids generated without exogenous Wnt activation develop anterior neural tissues , 2020, bioRxiv.

[11]  D. Stainier,et al.  Transcriptional adaptation: a mechanism underlying genetic robustness , 2020, Development.

[12]  R. Vadigepalli,et al.  Retinoic Acid Fluctuation Activates an Uneven, Direction-Dependent Network-Wide Robustness Response in Early Embryogenesis , 2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[13]  H. Vihinen,et al.  Heterochromatin-Driven Nuclear Softening Protects the Genome against Mechanical Stress-Induced Damage , 2020, Cell.

[14]  M. Levin,et al.  Morphological Coordination: A Common Ancestral Function Unifying Neural and Non-Neural Signaling. , 2020, Physiology.

[15]  Andrew D. Halleran,et al.  Xenopus embryos show a compensatory response following perturbation of the Notch signaling pathway , 2019, Developmental biology.

[16]  Troy J. Pells,et al.  Xenbase: deep integration of GEO & SRA RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data in a model organism database , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  O. Pourquié,et al.  Mechanics of Anteroposterior Axis Formation in Vertebrates. , 2019, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  P. Beldade,et al.  Genomics of Developmental Plasticity in Animals , 2019, Front. Genet..

[19]  B. Martin,et al.  Transformation of a neural activation and patterning model , 2019, EMBO reports.

[20]  N. Ueno,et al.  Cdc2‐like kinase 2 (Clk2) promotes early neural development in Xenopus embryos , 2019, Development, growth & differentiation.

[21]  D. Frank,et al.  New roles for Wnt and BMP signaling in neural anteroposterior patterning , 2019, EMBO reports.

[22]  A. Qutub,et al.  A novel self-organizing embryonic stem cell system reveals signaling logic underlying the patterning of human ectoderm , 2019, Development.

[23]  R. Harland,et al.  Integration of Wnt and FGF signaling in the Xenopus gastrula at TCF and Ets binding sites shows the importance of short-range repression by TCF in patterning the marginal zone , 2019, Development.

[24]  S. Moody Lineage Tracing and Fate Mapping in Xenopus Embryos. , 2018, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[25]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Nervous System Regionalization Entails Axial Allocation before Neural Differentiation , 2018, Cell.

[26]  Tim Ott,et al.  Xenopus: An Undervalued Model Organism to Study and Model Human Genetic Disease , 2018, Cells Tissues Organs.

[27]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Mechanics-guided embryonic patterning of neuroectoderm tissue from human pluripotent stem cells , 2018, Nature Materials.

[28]  A. Suzuki,et al.  Coordinated regulation of the dorsal‐ventral and anterior‐posterior patterning of Xenopus embryos by the BTB/POZ zinc finger protein Zbtb14 , 2018, Development, growth & differentiation.

[29]  A. Martinez Arias,et al.  On the nature and function of organizers , 2018, Development.

[30]  A. Streit,et al.  Neural induction by the node and placode induction by head mesoderm share an initial state resembling neural plate border and ES cells , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  L. N. Borodinsky Xenopus laevis as a Model Organism for the Study of Spinal Cord Formation, Development, Function and Regeneration , 2017, Front. Neural Circuits.

[32]  M. Eisen,et al.  A molecular atlas of the developing ectoderm defines neural, neural crest, placode, and nonneural progenitor identity in vertebrates , 2017, PLoS biology.

[33]  M. Bronner,et al.  Dynamic transcriptional signature and cell fate analysis reveals plasticity of individual neural plate border cells , 2017, eLife.

[34]  S. Moody,et al.  Using Xenopus to understand human disease and developmental disorders , 2017, Genesis.

[35]  G. Ming,et al.  Epigenetic mechanisms in neurogenesis , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  I. Daar,et al.  Neural transcription factors bias cleavage stage blastomeres to give rise to neural ectoderm , 2016, Genesis.

[37]  C. Carron,et al.  Specification of anteroposterior axis by combinatorial signaling during Xenopus development , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[38]  G. Blin,et al.  Position-dependent plasticity of distinct progenitor types in the primitive streak , 2016, eLife.

[39]  AnjaliL . Rao,et al.  Shared regulatory programs suggest retention of blastula-stage potential in neural crest cells , 2015, Science.

[40]  M. Mullins,et al.  Temporally coordinated signals progressively pattern the anteroposterior and dorsoventral body axes. , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[41]  M. Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Developmental plasticity, cell fate specification and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  I. Arregi,et al.  Active signals, gradient formation and regional specificity in neural induction. , 2014, Experimental cell research.

[43]  J. Nichols,et al.  A molecular basis for developmental plasticity in early mammalian embryos , 2013, Development.

[44]  S. L. Klein,et al.  On becoming neural: what the embryo can tell us about differentiating neural stem cells. , 2013, American journal of stem cells.

[45]  M. Mullins,et al.  Anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning are coordinated by an identical patterning clock , 2013, Development.

[46]  D. Kimelman,et al.  Anterior–posterior patterning in early development: three strategies , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[47]  R. Harland,et al.  Microinjection of Xenopus embryos. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[48]  R. Harland,et al.  Microinjection of RNA and preparation of secreted proteins from Xenopus oocytes. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[49]  R. Harland,et al.  Calibration of the injection volume for microinjection of Xenopus oocytes and embryos. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[50]  S. Moody,et al.  Neural induction and factors that stabilize a neural fate. , 2009, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[51]  J. I. Izpisúa Belmonte,et al.  Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms , 2009, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[52]  G. Crabtree,et al.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in neural development , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  N. Staudt,et al.  The Prethalamus Is Established during Gastrulation and Influences Diencephalic Regionalization , 2007, PLoS biology.

[54]  J. Krebs,et al.  Neural and eye-specific defects associated with loss of the Imitation Switch (ISWI) chromatin remodeler in Xenopus laevis , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[55]  M. Wullimann,et al.  Secondary neurogenesis in the brain of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, as revealed by PCNA, Delta‐1, Neurogenin‐related‐1, and NeuroD expression , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  C. Stern Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions , 2005, Development.

[57]  K. Kroll,et al.  The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 is required for vertebrate neurogenesis and mediates transactivation of Ngn and NeuroD , 2004, Development.

[58]  C. Niehrs Regionally specific induction by the Spemann–Mangold organizer , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[59]  S. Moody Xenopus Embryo: Neural Induction , 2001 .

[60]  V. Prince,et al.  Plasticity in zebrafish hox expression in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[61]  H. Sive,et al.  Vertebrate anteroposterior patterning: the Xenopus neurectoderm as a paradigm , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[62]  R. Keller,et al.  The role of planar and early vertical signaling in patterning the expression of Hoxb-1 in Xenopus. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[63]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Rhombomere of origin determines autonomous versus environmentally regulated expression of Hoxa-3 in the avian embryo. , 1996, Development.

[64]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition , 1996, Neuron.

[65]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) , 1995 .

[66]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Plasticity of transposed rhombomeres: Hox gene induction is correlated with phenotypic modifications. , 1995, Development.

[67]  A. Lumsden,et al.  Independent assignment of antero-posterior and dorso-ventral positional values in the developing chick hindbrain , 1995, Current Biology.

[68]  V. Prince,et al.  Selective dispersal of avian rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafts. , 1993, Development.

[69]  M. Saha,et al.  A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus , 1992, Neuron.

[70]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-2.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions , 1992, Nature.

[71]  J. Slack,et al.  Mechanism of anteroposterior axis specification in vertebrates. Lessons from the amphibians. , 1992, Development.

[72]  R. Grainger,et al.  Changes in neural and lens competence in Xenopus ectoderm: evidence for an autonomous developmental timer. , 1991, Development.

[73]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Progressive determination during formation of the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus laevis , 1989, Cell.

[74]  B. Albers Competence as the Main Factor Determining the Size of the Neural Plate , 1987, Development, growth & differentiation.

[75]  C. Kaye,et al.  Regulation in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis demonstrated by genetic markers. , 1985, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[76]  A. Jacobson THE DETERMINATION AND POSITIONING OF THE NOSE, LENS AND EAR. III. EFFECTS OF REVERSING THE ANTERO-POSTERIOR AXIS OF EPIDERMIS, NEURAL PLATE AND NEURAL FOLD. , 1963, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[77]  J. S. Nicholas RESULTS OF INVERSION OF NEURAL PLATE MATERIAL. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  P. Nieuwkoop,et al.  Activation and organization of the central nervous system in amphibians. Part III. Synthesis of a new working hypothesis , 1952 .

[79]  P. Nieuwkoop Activation and organization of the central nervous system in amphibians.† Part I. Induction and activation , 1952 .

[80]  C. Waddington,et al.  Studies on regional specificity within the organization centre of urodeles. , 1950, The Journal of experimental biology.

[81]  Frances Cummings Roach Differentiation of the central nervous system after axial reversals of the medullary plate of Amblystoma , 1945 .

[82]  Grace E Solini,et al.  Embryonic transplantation experiments: Past, present, and future. , 2017, Trends in developmental biology.

[83]  C. Joseph Plasticity. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[84]  Noah W. Gray,et al.  Plasticity , 2010, Nature.

[85]  S. Gilbert Continuity and change: paradigm shifts in neural induction. , 2001, The International journal of developmental biology.

[86]  R. Harland,et al.  Early development of Xenopus laevis : a laboratory manual , 2000 .

[87]  G. Eichele,et al.  Rhombomere transplantation repatterns the segmental organization of cranial nerves and reveals cell-autonomous expression of a homeodomain protein. , 1993, Development.