Rectangular jet or nappe flow constitutes one of the energy dissipation methods in arch dams. The high turbulence and aeration phenomena that appear in fall jets and dissipation basins make difficult to carry out their characterization only based in classical methodologies: reduced models and empirical formulae. The Hydraulics Laboratory of the Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena (Spain) has an infrastructure designed specifically for the study of turbulent jets and energy dissipation in plunge pools. The device allows us to study air-water two-phase phenomena (aeration, spray, spread and impact). The mobile mechanism lets us to vary the discharge heights between 1.70 and 4.00 m and flows between 10 and 150 l/s. To improve the knowledge of the phenomenon of turbulent jets, we are measuring aeration rates by means of fiber optical equipment, velocities in different sections of the stilling basin with Doppler instrumentations and pressures on the bottom of the plunge pool with piezoresistive transducers. Computational Fluid Dynamics programs (CFD) are based on numerical solution of the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, together with turbulence models of different degrees of complexity. The programs simulates the interaction between different fluids, such as the air-water two-phase flows, and constitute a new and powerful tool that could let contrast and complement the lab measurement. There are many studies modeling spillways with CFD methodology using different eddy viscosity turbulence models with accurate results. However, the study of overflow nappe impingement jets has not been sufficiently studied. Scale effects are important effects that need to be taking account. In this study, numerical simulations has been carry out using different scales ratio of the lab device according to Froude similarity (1:1; 1:10; 1:20 and 1:40). This paper compares the Parametric Methodology proposed by Castillo (2006, 2007) for the evaluation of hydrodynamic action in plunge pools, revised by Castillo and Carrillo (2011, 2012), with more and new laboratory measurements and the simulation results obtained with CFD program.
[1]
Pedro Manso,et al.
Dynamic pressures generated by plunging jets in confined pools under extreme flood discharges
,
2005
.
[2]
Tony L. Wahl,et al.
Computing the Trajectory of Free Jets
,
2008
.
[3]
E. Bollaert,et al.
Scour of rock due to the impact of plunging high velocity jets Part I: A state-of-the-art review
,
2003
.
[4]
Matteo Paolo Elia Antonio Federspiel.
Response of an embedded block impacted by high-velocity jets
,
2011
.
[5]
B. Kwiatkowska,et al.
Reference Guide
,
2019,
Rapid Review of ECG Interpretation in Small Animal Practice.
[6]
D K H Ho,et al.
Application of computational fluid dynamics to evaluate hydraulic performance of spillways in australia
,
2010
.
[7]
D. A. Ervine,et al.
Pressure fluctuations on plunge pool floors
,
1997
.
[8]
Erik Bollaert.
Scour of rock due to the impact of plunging high velocity jets Part I : A state-ofthe-art review Affouillement du rocher par impact de jets plongeants à haute vitesse Partie I : Un résumé de l ’ état des connaissances
,
2003
.
[9]
Criterios hidraúlicos para el diseño de cuencos de disipación de energía en presas bóveda con vertido libre por coronación
,
1995
.
[10]
Da Ervine,et al.
BEHAVIOUR OF TURBULENT WATER JETS IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND IN PLUNGE POOLS.
,
1987
.
[11]
W. L. Moore,et al.
Energy Loss at the Base of a Free Overfall
,
1943
.
[12]
L. G. Castillo.
AERATED JETS AND PRESSURE FLUCTUATION IN PLUNGE POOLS
,
2006
.
[13]
Colorado Colorado,et al.
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
,
2010
.
[14]
Luis Gerardo Castillo Elsitdié,et al.
Numerical Simulation and Validation of Hydrodynamics Actions in Energy Dissipation Devices
,
2011
.
[15]
Jerónimo Puertas,et al.
PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS ON PLUNGE POOL FLOORS
,
2010
.
[16]
L. G. Castillo.
Parametrical analysis of the ultimate scour and mean dynamic pressures at plunge pools
,
2007
.